rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:421-426 doi:10.1136/jech.2006.052662
  • Evidence based public health policy and practice

What are the effects of anti-discriminatory legislation on socioeconomic inequalities in the employment consequences of ill health and disability?

  1. Clare Bambra1,
  2. Daniel Pope2
  1. 1Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham Queen’s Campus, Stockton on Tees, UK
  2. 2Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr C Bambra
 Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen’s Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK; clare.bambra{at}durham.ac.uk
  • Accepted 15 September 2006

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how anti-discrimination legislation in the form of the UK Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) affected socioeconomic disparities in the employment rates of people with a limiting long-term illness (LLTI) or disability.

Design: National cross-sectional data on employment rates for people with and without an LLTI or disability were obtained from the General Household Survey (GHS) for a 14-year period (1990–2003; 12 surveys). Representative population samples were analysed. The sample size for the GHS over the study period ranged from 19 193 to 24 657 and the average response rate ranged from 72% to 82%.

Main outcome measure: Age-standardised employment rates for individuals with and without an LLTI or disability, analysed by sex and socioeconomic status.

Results: Analysis of covariance identified that the DDA had had a negative effect on employment rates for individuals with an LLTI or disability during the study period. This negative effect was found to be differential according to social class ranging from no effect in social classes I and II (−2.86%, 95% CI −8.7% to 2.99%), increasing with social class group, to a highly significant effect in social classes IV and V (−10.7%, 95% CI −6.16% to −15.24%). No differential effect was identified by sex.

Conclusions: Anti-discriminatory legislation is not an effective way of overcoming the employment consequences of ill health and disability, nor is it a useful public policy tool in terms of reducing inequalities.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs