Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women
Free
  1. Edith D Balbach1,
  2. Abby Herzberg1,
  3. Elizabeth M Barbeau2
  1. 1Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, USA
  2. 2Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor E D Balbach
 112 Packard Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA; edith.balbach{at}tufts.edu

Abstract

Objectives: To assess how the tobacco industry established a political relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women (CLUW) and to learn from this example how tobacco control advocates can work more effectively with organisations with which working class women are affiliated.

Methods: The study reviewed tobacco industry documents to determine Tobacco Institute strategy, using the CLUW News and other published material to corroborate our findings.

Results: The Tobacco Institute was effective at framing excise tax and smokefree worksite issues in a way that facilitated CLUW’s support of industry positions on these issues. The Tobacco Institute was also willing to reciprocate by providing financial and other kinds of support to CLUW.

Conclusions: While tobacco control missed an opportunity to partner with CLUW on smokefree worksites and excise taxes in the 1980s and 1990s, tobacco control can also use issue framing and reciprocity to form coalitions with organisations representing the interests of working women.

  • TI, Tobacco Institute
  • CLUW, Coalition of Labor Union Women
  • LMC, Labor Management Committee
  • TDO, Tobacco Documents Online
  • UCSF, University of California at San FRancisco
  • tobacco
  • public health policy
  • coalitions
  • organised labour

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: this research was supported by NCI grant RO1 CA095964.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.