rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:202-207 doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041020
  • Evidence based public health policy and practice

Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities

  1. Mario Schootman1,2,
  2. Donna B Jeffe1,2,
  3. Elizabeth A Baker3,
  4. Mark S Walker1,2
  1. 1Division of Health Behavior Research, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  2. 2The Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  3. 3Department of Community Health, Saint Louis School of Public Health, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr M Schootman
 Washington University, Division of Health Behavior Research, 4444 Forest Park Blvd, Box 8504, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA; mschootm{at}im.wustl.edu
  • Accepted 28 October 2005

Abstract

Study objective: To analyse the contextual effect of area poverty rate on never having been screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer by (1) describing the extent of the variation in screening behaviours among 98 US metropolitan areas; (2) determining if the variation in lack of screening can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the persons who resided in these areas; and (3) determining if living in a metropolitan area with a higher poverty rate increased the likelihood of never having been screened for cancer over and above individual characteristics.

Design: Cross sectional survey using data from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multilevel logistic regression included both individual level factors as well as area poverty rate.

Setting: Ninety eight areas across the USA.

Participants: Over 118 000 persons residing in 98 areas; a sample aimed at estimating 48.3% of the US population age 18 or older.

Main results: After adjustment for individual level factors, increasing area level poverty rate (per 5%) remained associated with never having had a mammogram (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.37); clinical breast examination (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), and a faecal occult blood test (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.27). Poverty rate was not independently associated with never having had a Pap smear (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.41). The size of the variance among metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MMSAs) varied by type of screening test, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 4.9% (never having had a Pap smear) to 1.2% (never having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy).

Conclusions: Area poverty rate was independently associated with never having been screened for breast and colorectal cancer, but not cervical cancer. The size of the variance among MMSAs was modest at best.

Footnotes

  • Funding: this research was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA91842, CA91734, CA98594) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 14095-01).

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs