rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:839-845 doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041251
  • Evidence based public health policy and practice

Effectiveness calculation in economic analysis: the case of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention

  1. Oscar H Franco1,
  2. Ewout W Steyerberg1,
  3. Anna Peeters2,
  4. Luc Bonneux3
  1. 1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Central and Eastern Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr O H Franco
 Unilever Corporate Research, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, UK; oscar.franco{at}unilever.com
  • Accepted 15 March 2006

Abstract

Objectives: This report aimed to evaluate the calculation of estimates of effectiveness in cost effectiveness analyses of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention.

Methods: Methodological aspects were reviewed of seven primary studies (based on trial results) and 12 secondary modelling studies (extrapolated) on the cost effectiveness of statin treatment, published between 1995 and 2002. Estimates of life years gained were extracted and compared with estimates calculated using the Dutch male life table of 1996–2000.

Results: Of the seven primary modelling analyses, six showed all the essential data. They estimated that 3 to 5.6 years (average 4.6 years) of statin treatment resulted in 0.15 to 0.41 years (average 0.3 years) saved over a lifetime time horizon. In contrast none of the 12 secondary modelling studies provided transparent results. They assumed lifelong treatment, leading to life table estimations of 2.4 and 2.0 (undiscounted) years saved for 40 and 60 year olds, with peak savings at around the mean age of death: 75–80 years. With 5% discounting, these effects reduced to 0.4 and 0.8 years respectively.

Conclusion: Reporting of essential data and assumptions on statin treatment was poor for secondary modelling analyses and satisfactory for primary modelling studies. Secondary modeling studies made assumptions on long term effectiveness that were hard to justify with the available evidence, and that led to the majority of life years saved at high ages. Further standardisation in economic analyses is important to guarantee transparency and reproducibility of results.

Footnotes

  • Funding: this study was supported by a grant from Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (ZON-MW). OHF, ES, AP, and LB were partly funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research ZonMw (grant number 904-66-093). AP was also partly funded by VicHealth (fellowship grant number 2002-0191). All authors declare to have acted independently from the funders of this project.

  • Ethical approval was not needed, as this was a secondary data analysis.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs