Postnatal support for mothers living in disadvantaged inner city areas: a randomised controlled trial
- M Wiggins1,
- A Oakley1,
- I Roberts2,
- H Turner1,
- L Rajan1,
- H Austerberry1,
- R Mujica3,
- M Mugford3,
- M Barker4
- 1Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, UK
- 2Public Health Intervention Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London
- 3Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, UK
- 4Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital NHS Trust, UK
- Correspondence to: MsM Wiggins SSRU, 18 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0NR, UK; m.wigginsioe.ac.uk
- Accepted 19 August 2004
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the effect of two forms of postnatal social support for disadvantaged inner city mothers on maternal and child health outcomes.
Design: Randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluations and follow up at 12 and 18 months. The two intervention groups received either the offer of a year of monthly supportive listening home visits by a support health visitor (SHV), or a year of support from community groups providing drop in sessions, home visiting and/or telephone support (CGS). Each was compared with a control group that received standard health visitor services.
Setting: Two disadvantaged boroughs of London, United Kingdom.
Participants: 731 women from culturally diverse backgrounds with infants.
Main results: At 12 and 18 months, there was little impact for either intervention on the main outcomes: child injury (SHV: relative risk 0.99; 95% confidence intervals 0.68 to 1.45, CGS: 0.91; 0.61 to1.36), maternal smoking (SHV: 0.86; 0.62 to 1.19, CGS: 0.97; 0.72 to 1.33) or maternal depression (SHV: 0.86; 0.62 to1.19, CGS: 0.93; 0.69 to 1.27). SHV women had different patterns of health service use (with fewer taking their children to the GP) and had less anxious experiences of motherhood than control women. User satisfaction with the SHV intervention was high. Uptake of the CGS intervention was low: 19%, compared with 94% for the SHV intervention.
Conclusions: There was no evidence of impact on the primary outcomes of either intervention among this culturally diverse population. The SHV intervention was associated with improvement in some of the secondary outcomes.
- SSFH, social support and family health study
- SHV, support health visitor
- CGS, community group support
- EPDS, Edinburgh postnatal depression scale
- GHQ, general helath questionnaire
- DUFSS, Duke UNC functional social support scale
Footnotes
-
Funding: this study was funded by the Health Technology Assessment Programme of the NHS R& D programme and by the Camden and Islington Health Authority. The views and opinions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health.
-
Conflicts of interest: none declared.
