rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:257 doi:10.1136/jech.2004.028753
  • Surveys
  • Editorial

Population ideals and sample realities—why we still need access to comprehensive information about populations

  1. Geraldine Barrett,
  2. Janet L Peacock
  1. School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Middlesex, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr G Barrett
 School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Osterley Campus, Borough Road, Middlesex TW7 5DU, UK; geraldine.barrettbrunel.ac.uk

    Public health population research will be rendered impossible if individual consent for all secondary uses of health data becomes the norm.

    Much epidemiological and health services research relies on surveys and Jousilahti et al’s paper1 is a timely reminder to us about the biases caused by participants’ non-response. Although we all know that non-response is a socially patterned phenomenon, this knowledge is so familiar that it is easy to become complacent—how many of us have ticked the mental boxes of “>70%” and “information about response biases” as markers of a good quality survey when reading or reviewing a paper? Jousilahti et al’s paper is valuable in that it provides data …

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

    Ophthalmology Jobs