rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:238-242 doi:10.1136/jech.2004.021824
  • Research report

Organisational downsizing as a predictor of disability pension: the 10-town prospective cohort study

  1. Jussi Vahtera1,
  2. Mika Kivimäki2,3,
  3. Pauli Forma4,
  4. Juhani Wikström5,
  5. Tuomo Halmeenmäki4,
  6. Anne Linna1,
  7. Jaana Pentti1
  1. 1Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland
  2. 2Department of Psychology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland
  4. 4The Finnish Local Government Pensions Institution, Helsinki, Finland
  5. 5State Treasury, Helsinki, Finland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr J Vahtera
 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Hämeenkatu 10, FIN-20500 Turku, Finland; jussi.vahteraoccuphealth.fi
  • Accepted 10 June 2004

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether downsizing, the reduction of personnel in organisations, is a predictor of increased risk of disability retirement among employees who kept their jobs.

Design: Prospective cohort study. Based on reductions of personnel in participants’ occupation and workplace, employees were grouped into exposure categories of no downsizing (less than 8% reduction), minor downsizing (reduction between 8% and 18%), and major downsizing (more than 18% reduction). They were followed up for a five year period after downsizing.

Setting: Four towns in Finland.

Participants: 19 273 municipal employees, aged 21–54 years.

Main outcome measures: All permanent full disability pensions granted because of medical reasons below 55 years of age between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1998 from the national registers.

Results: In all, 223 employees were granted a permanent disability pension. The overall rate for disability pensions per 1000 employees was 7.7 after no downsizing, 13.1 after minor downsizing, and 14.9 after major downsizing. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, occupational status, type of employment contract, and town showed 1.81 (95% confidence intervals 1.22 to 2.70) times higher risk of disability retirement after major downsizing than after no downsizing.

Conclusions: The immediate financial advantages of downsizing need to be considered in relation to increased occupational disability and the resulting extra costs to employers and society.

Footnotes

  • Funding: this study was supported by the Academy of Finland (projects 77560, 104891, and 105195), the Finnish Work Environment Fund (projects 101190 and 103432), the Finnish Local Government Pensions Institution, and the participating towns.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs