You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 58, Issue 8
  • Association of quality of life in old age in Britain with socioeconomic position: baseline data from a randomised controlled trial

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Research report
Association of quality of life in old age in Britain with socioeconomic position: baseline data from a randomised controlled trial
  1. Elizabeth Breeze1,
  2. Dee A Jones2,
  3. Paul Wilkinson1,
  4. Amina M Latif2,
  5. Christopher J Bulpitt3,
  6. Astrid E Fletcher1
  1. 1Centre for Ageing and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2University Department of Geriatric Medicine, Llandough Hospital, Penarth, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3Section of Care of the Elderly, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr E Breeze
 Centre for Ageing and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; elizabeth.breezelshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Study objective: To identify socioeconomic differentials in quality of life among older people and their explanatory factors.

Design: Baseline data from a cluster randomised controlled trial of the assessment and management of older people in primary care. Outcome measures were being in the worst quintile of scores for, respectively, the Philadelphia geriatric morale scale and four dimensions of functioning from the sickness impact profile (home management, mobility, self care, and social interaction).

Setting: 23 general practices in Britain.

Participants: People aged 75 years and over on GP registers at the time of recruitment, excluding those in nursing homes or terminally ill. Of 9547 people eligible, 90% provided full information on quality of life and 6298 also did a brief assessment.

Results: The excess risk of poor quality of life for independent people renting rather than owning their home ranged from 27% for morale (95% CI 9% to 48%) to 62% for self care (95% CI 35% to 94%). Self reported health problems plus smoking and alcohol consumption accounted for half or more of the excess, depending on the outcome. Having a low socioeconomic position in middle age as well as in old age exacerbated the risks of poor outcomes. Among people living with someone other than spouse the excess risk from renting ranged from 24% (95%CI −10% to 70%) for poor home management to 93% (95%CI 30% to 180%) for poor morale.

Conclusions: Older people retain the legacy of past socioeconomic position and are subject to current socioeconomic influences.

  • SIP, sickness impact profile
  • QoL, quality of life scores
  • quality of life
  • health inequalities
  • older people
  • Sickness Impact Profile

https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.014035

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • ↵* One pack year was defined as smoking the equivalent of 20 cigarettes a day for one year.

    • Funding: the analyses in this paper were funded by Economic and Social Research Council grant L480254018 as part of the Growing Older Program. The trial from which the data were obtained was funded by the Medical Research Council, Department of Health, and Scottish Office.

    • Conflicts of interest: none declared.

    Linked Articles