Responses

PDF

Bias
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    tackling Consent Bias
    • Kannan anjur anjur, Professor Community Medicine University College Of medical Sciences,Delhi-110095,India
    • Other Contributors:
      • Kavita Venkataraman,O.P.Kalra,A.K.Sharma

    Dear Editor,

    It is with great interest we read the response with well researched references to this article on bias. We were particularly curious to know how to tackle consent bias as consent is an ethical issue and many high risk persons do not get included in an epidemiological study both observational or interventional because of cultural values due to exclusion of non consenters.There should be a method to t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Updating a glossary of biases

    Dear Editor

    Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez and Javier Llorca’s article on bias in health services and medical research is instructive and cautionary [1]. The extensive glossary of biases is thought provoking and might beneficially be introduced as required reading for all researchers.

    The glossary might be usefully updated by the addition of a form of selection bias which is very much “of our time”, having be...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.