rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:590-596 doi:10.1136/jech.2003.013383
  • Research report

Exploring the relation between class, gender, and self rated general health using the new socioeconomic classification. A study using data from the 2001 census

  1. Frances Drever,
  2. Tim Doran,
  3. Margaret Whitehead
  1. Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr T Doran
 Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK; timdoranliverpool.ac.uk
  • Accepted 21 October 2003

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relation between class, gender, and self rated health in adults in Great Britain.

Design: Cross sectional study using data from the 2001 national census.

Setting: Great Britain.

Participants: Adults aged between 25 and 64 in Great Britain, enumerated in the 2001 census (n = 30.3 million).

Main outcome measures: Age standardised rates of self rated general health for men and women in different socioeconomic groupings as defined by the National Statistics classification (NS-SeC), rate ratios and the (modified) relative index of inequality.

Results: There was a pronounced gradient in rates of “not good” health among people in different social positions. The rate for people in class 7 (routine occupations) was more than double that for people in class 1 (higher managerial and professional occupations): 95 per 1000 and 37 per 1000 respectively. Health inequalities were larger for men than for women—the rate ratio of class 7 to class 1 was 2.7 for men and 2.2 for women. The nature and size of the gender differences varied by socioeconomic class, with the greatest gap among people in class 1 (higher managerial and professional occupations), where the rate for women was 25% higher than for men.

Conclusions: The NS-SeC shows a pronounced gradient in self rated general health across the population of working age in Great Britain in 2001. It was found that the NS-SeC was a useful measure for women, although it may be better at classifying men. The size of the gender gap in “not good” health varied by NS-SeC class.

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Competing interests: none declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs