rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 58:1052-1054 doi:10.1136/jech.2004.020008
  • Research report

Are there socioeconomic gradients in the quality of data held by UK cancer registries?

Table 1

 Odds ratios and tests for trend of odds of registration by death certification only and missing data on stage and grade at diagnosis by quintiles of Townsend deprivation score (adjusted for age and sex)

Quintiles of TDS TDS range Total number of registrations Registration by DCO Data on stage at diagnosis missing Data on grade at diagnosis missing
Number (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) Number (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) Number (%) Odds ratio (95% CI)
*Significant at the 0.1% level. TDS, Townsend deprivation score; DCO, death certification only.
1 (most affluent) −8.89 to −3.24 5040 54 (1.07) 1.00 reference 662 (13.13) 1.00 reference 860 (17.06) 1.00 reference
2 −3.24 to −1.64 5052 60 (1.19) 1.02 (0.70 to 1.47) 656 (12.98) 0.93 (0.82 to 1.05) 893 (17.68) 1.00 (0.89 to 1.11)
3 −1.64 to 0.31 5037 55 (1.09) 0.86 (0.59 to 1.26) 750 (14.89) 1.05 (0.93 to 1.18) 971 (19.28) 1.07 (0.96 to 1.19)
4 0.31 to 2.84 5056 60 (1.19) 0.89 (0.61 to 1.29) 928 (18.35) 1.31 (1.17 to 1.47) 1111 (21.97) 1.22 (1.10 to 1.36)
5 (most deprived) 2.84 to 8.45 5039 54 (1.07) 0.87 (0.59 to 1.28) 910 (18.06) 1.34 (1.19 to 1.50) 1083 (21.49) 1.25 (1.12 to 1.38)
Test for trend of odds χ2 = 0.78, p = 0.378 χ2 = 50.85, p<0.0001* χ2 = 28.36, p<0.0001*

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JECH.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.