rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:530-535 doi:10.1136/jech.57.7.530
  • Theory and methods

Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease

  1. B Unal1,2,
  2. J A Critchley1,
  3. S Capewell1
  1. 1Department of Public Health, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr B Unal, Department of Public Health, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK; 
 belgina{at}liv.ac.uk
  • Accepted 3 November 2002

Abstract

Study objective: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the commonest cause of death in the UK. However, there is no single comprehensive source of information to support CHD prevention and treatment strategies. Therefore this study evaluated the availability and quality of UK CHD data sources since 1981.

Design: Data sources for England and Wales were identified and appraised on:

(1) CHD patient numbers (myocardial infarction, angina, hypertension, and heart failure); (2) uptake of medical and surgical CHD treatments, and (3) population trends in major cardiovascular risk factors.

Setting: England and Wales (population 53 million).

Main results: Population and mortality data were easily accessible from Office for National Statistics and British Heart Foundation Annual CHD Statistics; population based risk factor data came principally from the British Regional Heart Study, the General Household Survey, and the Health Survey for England. They were limited for 1981, but more extensive by 2000. Hospital admissions information since 1998 was available online from HES; but trend data and details of interventions were scant. Limited primary care data on consultation rates, prescribing, and treatment uptake were available from published audits and studies.

Conclusions: Information on CHD in the UK is fragmented, patchy, and mixed in quality. Data for women, the elderly populatiom, and ethnic minorities were particularly scarce, exacerbating inequalities. Future CHD disease monitoring and evaluation will require comprehensive and accurate population based information on trends in patient numbers, treatment uptake, and risk factors.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Belgin Unal was funded by a North West Regional Research and Development Training Fellowship.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs