Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Sporadic cases of community acquired legionnaires’ disease: an ecological study to identify new sources of contamination
  1. D Che,
  2. B Decludt,
  3. C Campese,
  4. J C Desenclos
  1. Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint Maurice, France
  1. Correspondence to: 
 Dr B Decludt, Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Département des Maladies Infectieuses, 12 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint Maurice cédex, France; 
 b.decludt{at}invs.sante.fr

Abstract

Study objective: To explore the relation between incidence of sporadic and community acquired legionnaires’ disease and exposure to potentially contaminated industrial aerosols.

Design: Geographical ecological approach using the postcode as the statistical unit. A multivariate Poisson regression model was used to model the relation between exposure to industrial aerosols and legionnaires’ disease.

Setting: Metropolitan France.

Main results: More than 1000 sources of industrial exposure (aerosol and plume of smoke) were identified in 42 French departments. After adjusting for confounding factors, there was a statistically increased incidence of legionnaires’ disease in postcodes with plume of smoke in comparison with postcodes without (RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.12 to 1.87), and in postcodes with more than one aerosol in comparison with postcodes without (RR=1.37, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.79).

Conclusion: These findings highlight that any industrial systems generating water aerosols should be regarded as potential sources of contamination for legionnaires’ disease.

  • legionnaires’ disease
  • industrial exposure
  • Poisson modelling
  • ecological study

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: this work was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, France.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.

Linked Articles