rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:125-129 doi:10.1136/jech.57.2.125
  • Research report

Income related inequalities in self assessed health in Britain: 1979–1995

  1. H Gravelle1,
  2. M Sutton2
  1. 1National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK
  2. 2General Practice and Primary Care, Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor H Gravelle, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK;
 hg8{at}york.ac.uk
  • Accepted 27 June 2002

Abstract

Study objective: To measure and decompose income related inequalities in self assessed health in England, Scotland, and Wales, 1979–1995.

Design: The relation between individual health and a non-linear transformation of equivalised income, allowing for sex, age, country, and year effects, was estimated by multiple regression. The share of health attributable to transformed income and the Gini coefficient for transformed income were calculated. Inequality in health was measured by the partial concentration index, which is the product of the Gini coefficient and the share of health attributable to transformed income.

Participants and setting: Representative annual samples of the adult population living in private households in Great Britain 1979–1995. The total analysed sample was 299 968 people.

Main results: Pro-rich health inequality was largest in Wales and smallest in England over the period because the effect of increased income on health was greatest in Wales and least in England. In all three countries, pro-rich health inequality increased throughout the period. In the early 1980s this was primarily attributable to increases in income inequality. Thereafter the increased share of health attributable to income was the principal cause.

Conclusions: Reductions in pro-rich health inequality can be achieved by reducing income inequality, reducing the effect of income on health, or both.

Footnotes

  • Funding: HG is funded by the English Department of Health through the National Primary Care R&D Centre. At the time of the study MS was funded by ISDScotland, Greater Glasgow Primary Care NHS Trust and Greater Glasgow NHS Board. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs