rss
J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:606-610 doi:10.1136/jech.56.8.606
  • Theory and methods

Impact numbers: measures of risk factor impact on the whole population from case-control and cohort studies

  1. R F Heller1,
  2. A J Dobson2,
  3. J Attia3,
  4. J Page4
  1. 1Evidence for Population Health Unit, The Medical School, The University of Manchester, UK
  2. 2School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  3. 3Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
  4. 4Department of Epidemiology, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor R Heller, The Medical School, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building Manchester M13 9PT, UK;
 Dick.heller{at}man.ac.uk
  • Accepted 15 November 2001

Abstract

Objective: To describe new measures of risk from case-control and cohort studies, which are simple to understand and relate to numbers of the population at risk.

Design: Theoretical development of new measures of risk.

Setting: Review of literature and previously described measures.

Main results: The new measures are: (1) the population impact number (PIN), the number of those in the whole population among whom one case is attributable to the exposure or risk factor (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the population attributable risk); (2) the case impact number (CIN) the number of people with the disease or outcome for whom one case will be attributable to the exposure or risk factor (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the population attributable fraction); (3) the exposure impact number (EIN) the number of people with the exposure among whom one excess case is attributable to the exposure (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the attributable risk); (4) the exposed cases impact number (ECIN) the number of exposed cases among whom one case is attributable to the exposure (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the aetiological fraction). The impact number reflects the number of people in each population (the whole population, the cases, all those exposed, and the exposed cases) among whom one case is attributable to the particular risk factor.

Conclusions: These new measures should help communicate the impact on a population, of estimates of risk derived from cohort or case-control studies.

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflicts of interest: none.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Ophthalmology Jobs