Article Text

PDF

The ideal minister of health
  1. S K Kapoor
  1. Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project, All India Insititute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr S K Kapoor;
 crhspaiims{at}sancharnet.in

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Background and outlook matters, not necessarily medical qualifications

Ideals exist only in fiction but shape our thinking. Over the years, only a few health ministers in India have managed to leave a lasting impression. In my personal opinion, the two best were Rajkumari Amrit Kaur and Karan Singh. Both had a royal lineage and were steeped in Indian values and part of the freedom struggle. While Rajkumari provided the initial impetus and dynamism to the ministry immediately after independence, Dr Singh came at a time when health was declining in importance in the government. Both of them were philosophical (Dr Singh has a doctorate) and had a very broad vision and looked at health in its entirety. India also had doctors as the health minister, though they did not do as well. Our experience has been that doctors as health ministers tend to have a narrow interpretation of health and look more into curative aspects than public health aspects. While in general, it is believed and is probably true that, women have more empathy for this kind of work, our experience is that this empathy does not get translated into any concrete action at policy or implementation level. Having a real grass root experience, preferably with a rural background, has its advantages. This gives you a sense of equity and a real close look at the problems that you are trying to solve. However, you should be careful that, while you get a ringside view of the things, we need a bird’s eye view for policy matters so that we get the right perspective.

In India, the health ministry currently gets a very low priority. On many occasions there is not a full fledged cabinet minister but only a minister of state. Partly the reason for this is that health is in a concurrent list, which means that state governments have an equal part to play. Many states are larger than most countries in the world in terms of population. In states, the priority for health is even less important. In this era of decentralisation and restructuring, there was even a thought as to whether a health ministry is needed at all at the central level. Only the fact that many of the disease control programmes are centrally funded and the state governments are not inclined to pick up the bills, has ensured its continuation. Undoubtedly there is a need to bring health into the centre of focus. We therefore need people who have a high public profile and are media savvy. However, it is also true that such a high profile politician is unlikely to be happy with the health ministry and might consider it as a “let down”. Unlike in the past, we now have young urban, sophisticated professionals entering politics. This augurs well for politics in general but whether this will usher professionalism in the health ministry is to be seen.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that we need to clean the Augean stables of the health ministry. There is nothing like a woman, preferably a dominating one (a la Brundtland perhaps!) to wield a broomstick for cleaning the corridors of the health ministry. We need to jolt the bureaucrats and technocrats of the health ministry into action.

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.