The unseen face of humanitarian crisis in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: was nutritional relief properly targeted?
- Denis Porignona,b,
- Isu Katulanyaa,
- Lokombe Elongoa,
- Nytha Ntalemwac,
- René Tongletd,
- Michèle Dramaixb,
- Philippe Hennarta,b
- aScientific and Medical Centre of the Free University of Brussels (ULB) for its Co-operation Actions - CEMUBAC Team, Brussels (Belgium) and Goma (Democratic Republic of Congo), bSchool of Public Health, Free University of Brussels (ULB), Brussels, Belgium, cOxford Famine Relief, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo , dSchool of Public Health, Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Brussels, Belgium
- Dr P Hennart, CEMUBAC, School of Public Health, Free University of Brussels (ULB), Route de Lennik 808 (CP 595), B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
- Accepted 25 April 1999
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Comparison of children's nutritional status in refugee populations with that of local host populations, one year after outbreak refugee crisis in the North Kivu region of Democratic Republic of Congo.
DESIGN Cross sectional surveys.
SETTING Temporary and other settlements, in the town of Goma and surrounding rural areas.
SUBJECTS Anthropometric indicators of nutritional status and presence or absence of oedema were measured among 5121 children aged 6 to 59 months recruited by cluster sampling with probability proportional to size, between June and August 1995.
RESULTS Children in all locations demonstrated a typical pattern of growth deficit relative to international reference. Prevalence of acute malnutrition (wt/ht < −2 Z score) was higher among children in the rural non-refugee populations (3.8 and 5.8%) than among those in the urban non-refugee populations (1.4%) or in the refugee population living in temporary settlements (1.7%). Presence of oedema was scarcely noticed in camps (0.4%) while it was a common observation at least in the most remote rural areas (10.1%). As compared with baseline data collected in 1989, there is evidence that nutritional status was worsening in rural non-refugee populations.
CONCLUSIONS Children living in the main town or in the refugee camps benefited the most from nutritional relief while those in the rural non-refugee areas were ignored. This is a worrying case of inequity in nutritional relief.
Footnotes
-
Funding: the health activities of the CEMUBAC in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo are funded by the Commission of the European Union (DG VIII) and by the Belgian governmental agency for co-operation in development (AGCD). This research was partially supported by a grant from the “Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique et Médicale (FRSM) (grant no: 3.4510.96).
-
Conflicts of interest: none.







