Research report
Social inequalities in health related behaviours in Barcelona
Carme Borrell, Felicitas Domínguez-Berjón, M Isabel Pasarín, Josep Ferrando, Izabella Rohlfs, Manel Nebot
Municipal Institute
of Public Health. Barcelona, Spain
Correspondence to: Dr C Borrell, Municipal Institute of Public Health, Pl Lesseps 1, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
Accepted for publication 24 May 1999
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OBJECTIVE
This study
describes social class inequalities in health related behaviours
(tobacco and alcohol consumption, physical activity) among a sample of
general population over 14 years old in Barcelona.
DESIGN
Cross sectional
study (Barcelona Health Interview Survey).
SETTING
Barcelona city (Spain).
PARTICIPANTS
A
representative stratified sample of the non-institutionalised
population resident in Barcelona was obtained. This study refers to the
4171 respondents aged over 14.
DATA
Social
class was obtained from a Spanish adaptation of the British Registrar
General classification. In addition, sociodemographic variables such as
family structure and employment status were used. As health related
behaviours tobacco consumption, alcohol consumption, usual physical
activity and leisure time physical activity were analysed. Age adjusted
percentages were compared by social class. Multivariate analysis was
performed using logistic regression models.
MAIN RESULTS
Women in
the upper social classes were more likely to smoke, the adjusted odds
ratio (OR) for social class V in reference to social class I was 0.36 (95% confidence intervals (95%CI): 0.19, 0.67), while the opposite
occurred among men although it was not statistically significant in
multivariate analysis. Smoking cessation was more likely among men in
the higher classes (OR for class V 0.41, 95%CI: 0.18, 0.90). Excessive
alcohol consumption among men showed no differences between classes,
while among women it was greater in the upper classes. Engaging in
usual physical activity classified as "light or none" in men
decreased with lowering social class (OR class IVa: 0.55 and OR class
IVb: 0.47). Women of social classes IV and V were less likely to have
two or more health risk behaviours (OR for class V 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.62).
CONCLUSION
Health
damaging behaviours are differentially distributed among social classes
in Barcelona. Health policies should take into account these inequalities.
(J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:24-30)
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Health related behaviours are often thought of as "voluntary", but this is a rather superficial view. For example, smoking and alcohol consumption may be regarded less as personal habits than as cultural norms, determined by social pressures; or persons of low social classes may not have the time or energy to engage in leisure time physical activity.1 It is now widely accepted that health status and its determinants, including lifestyle and health related behaviours, are differentially distributed among social classes.2
The determinants of health behaviour are in general poorly understood. In some cases, like eating patterns or leisure time physical activity, access and availability might play a direct part, as eating "healthy" and practising sports are relatively expensive options. In this regard, it is also well known that lower class persons tend to perform less physical activity in their leisure time and more in their jobs.2 3
In some other behaviours the picture can be even more complex, especially when we are dealing with legal addictive substances such as tobacco and alcohol. The case of smoking is remarkable, as it seems to have followed a diffusion model in most developed countries after the second world war,4 a pattern that is strongly related to socioeconomic factors. In this regard, the current prevalence of smokers in the USA and northern European countries is higher in the lower social classes. However, the pattern seems to be different in southern European countries, especially among women, where the higher classes smoke more.5 6 In a previous study in Barcelona we reported a decrease in smoking among upper classes men between 1983 and 1992, paralleled by an increase in smoking among lower class women.7 Alcohol consumption is related to the historical position of alcohol within the local economy and social events. Nevertheless, some differences according to social class, with more heavy drinkers in disadvantaged classes, have been shown.1 2
Compared with other European countries, southern European countries present intermediate levels of wealth between those of north and central Europe and those of east Europe. In southern European countries the study of inequalities is relatively recent, and there are few studies available.8-10The pattern of social inequalities in health in Spain, as in other countries of southern Europe, presents certain differential characteristics compared with central and northern European countries.10 11
Barcelona, like most large cities, presents important social inequalities in health. So far, however, most studies have been based on mortality statistics, drawing attention to the higher mortality and shorter life expectancy in wards with lower socioeconomic levels,12-14 inequalities that have widened with time.15 This study describes social class inequalities in health related behaviours (tobacco and alcohol consumption, physical activity) in the over 14 year population in the city of Barcelona.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data analysed in this study were collected in 1992 in the Barcelona Health Interview Survey, a periodic cross sectional population survey carried out in the city of Barcelona (1 650 000 inhabitants), in the north east of Spain. A representative stratified sample of the non-institutionalised population resident in Barcelona according to the population census of 1991 was obtained. The census tracks of the city were grouped into five strata, based on sociodemographic variables obtained from the 1986 census (variables based on age and sex distribution, educational level, occupational level, employment status and migration). The sample size in each stratum depended on the variability of sociodemographic variables in it. The sampling unit in each stratum was the individual and in each stratum a random sample of people was obtained. Total sample size was established as 5004 persons, with an alpha error of 5% and a maximum global error of 1.6% (this global error is one half the width of the desired sample confidence interval).16 The information was collected through a face to face interview carried out at home, between February 1992 and January 1993. Non-responses were 9%. This study refers to the 4171 respondents aged over 14.
The questionnaire of the Barcelona Health Interview Survey was adapted from previous health interview surveys.16 The tobacco questions were based on WHO recommendations.17 The question on alcohol consumption was asked in the same way as it had been in the 1987 Health Interview Survey of the Basque Country (Spain).18 Physical activity items were taken from those used in the Welsh Heart Health Survey in 1985.19
Social class was obtained from a Spanish adaptation of the 1980 British Registrar General classification.20 Class I includes managerial and senior technical staff and free professionals; class II includes intermediate occupations and managers in commerce; class III, skilled non-manual workers; class IV, skilled (IVa) and partly skilled (IVb) manual workers; and class V, unskilled manual workers. Social class was derived from current or last occupation. People reporting none were assigned the social class of the head of the household (22% of men and 44% of women).
The Spanish classification of social class was created by comparing the
occupations in both Britain and Spain. In most cases occupations fell
into the same social class, because it was assumed that the social
position was the same. However, there were some cases assigned to a
different social class. For example, writers and journalists in Spain
were put in social class I. Non-manual occupations were assigned to
social class III and manual to social class IV (whereas in the British
classification both manual and non-manual skilled occupations are part
of social class III).20 The Spanish classification has
been widely used in Spain and has been recommended by the Spanish
Epidemiological Society.21 Social class determined with
this classification has shown a high correlation with educational
level.22 Besides, family structure and employment status
were used as other sociodemographic variables.23 24 Table
1 summarises characteristics of the population over 14 years of age,
interviewed during the health survey, according to sociodemographic
variables by men and women.
|
The variables studied were:
TOBACCO CONSUMPTION
People who smoked daily one or more cigarettes at the time of the
survey were considered current smokers; those who had smoked one or
more cigarettes a day in the past (six months ago or before) but did
not smoke at the time of the survey were considered ex-smokers; and
those who declared themselves non-smokers, or who smoked less than one
a day were labelled non-smokers. The rate of smoking cessation was
calculated as the number of ex-smokers over the total number of smokers
and ex-smokers.
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION
The amount of alcohol ingested daily, in grams, was determined by
daily consumption during the previous week. The interviewees were
classified as: non-drinkers, light drinkers (men who consumed less than
40 g per day and women who consumed less than 20 g), and heavy drinkers
(men who consumed 40 g or more per day, and women who stated they had
consumed 20 g or more per day). The limits of alcohol for a heavy
drinker reflect levels at which the risk of overall mortality
increases.25
USUAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
This variable was defined as the total physical activity usually
undertaken and therefore includes activity on the job and outside it.
It was obtained from a question in which the activity was catalogued as
important or intense (physical activity requiring important physical
effort), moderate (frequent walking), light (most of the day standing),
or none (seated most of the day).
LEISURE TIME PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Obtained from two questions that asked about the number of
occasions on which the subject had performed various sports, for at
least 20 minutes, of moderate intensity (bicycle riding, gymnastics, aerobics, jogging, tennis, swimming) and of high intensity (competition swimming, football, basketball, hockey, competition cycling, squash, martial arts). People who regularly and vigorously performed physical activity three or more times per week in leisure time were classified as having performed some leisure time physical activity, because it has
been demonstrated that this amount of physical activity improves
cardiovascular fitness.26
In the data analysis each person had an assigned weight to adjust for the sample stratification. To compare the different variables among the different social classes, we used age adjusted percentages by the direct method and its 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).27 The reference population was the whole survey sample (n=4171 aged over 14). Multivariate analysis was performed to study the association between social class and health behaviours adjusting for age, employment status and family structure23 24 through logistic regression models. Interaction between age and social class was tested in the models but it was not statistically significant. Goodness of fit was obtained using the Hosmer Lemeshow test.28
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In women the prevalence of smokers was higher in social class I
(29.8%) and decreased until social class V (18%). The adjusted odds
ratio (OR) for social class V in reference to social class I was 0.36 (95%CI: 0.19, 0.67). The opposite occurred among men, where the
classes IV and V smoked more (table 2). These results were also
reflected in the multivariate analyses adjusted for age, employment
status and family structure, even though among men the association lost
statistical significance (table 3). Smoking cessation was greater among
men in the higher classes, OR for classes IV and V were less than 1 and
statistically significant; in women no clear trends were observed
(table 3).
|
|
Among women light and excessive alcohol consumption were greater in classes I and II, with ORs becoming progressively smaller and further from 1. Among men light alcohol consumption was more important in upper classes (61% of class I and 45% of class V, OR=0.57, 95%CI:0.32, 1.00), while no differences were found in excessive alcohol consumption (tables 2 and 3).
Less than 5% of men and women in class I declared that they usually performed intense physical activity in contrast with 11.5% of men and 8.6% of women in class V (table 2), an association that persisted in the multivariate analysis, the ORs for the lower classes being greater than 2 (table 3). People of social classes I and II were more likely to engage in usual physical activity classified as "light or none" than lower social classes (table 3). For leisure time physical activity the situation is reversed, particularly in men, as a greater proportion of the lower classes did not engage in physical activity three or more times per week (74% of men in class I and 79% in class V). In the multivariate analysis the association was not statistically significant (OR for class V: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.61, 2.57). In women there was no clear trend (tables 2 and 3).
Table 4 depicts the number of reported health risk behaviours according
to social class. Women of higher classes were engaged in two or more
health risk behaviours more frequently and it was statistically
significant in multivariate analysis (OR for class V: 0.33, 95%CI:
0.18, 0.62) (table 3). In men the situation is reversed, although it
was not statistically significant in multivariate analysis (tables 3
and 4).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This is one of the first studies on social inequalities in health related behaviours in a southern European city. Overall, it has shown that the patterns of tobacco consumption according to social class are different for men and women. In this regard, a higher prevalence of smokers was found among women of higher class. The opposite is true in men although not statistically significant. Smoking cessation was greater among men in the higher classes. Men and women of social class I and II were more likely to report light alcohol consumption. Excessive alcohol consumption among men showed no significant differences between classes; while among women the consumption was higher in the highest social classes. The lower class population, especially men, stated that they performed more usual physical activity and less leisure time physical activity (this was not statistically significant in multivariate analysis).
TOBACCO CONSUMPTION
In Spain tobacco is easily available and cheap, and its
consumption has a high social acceptance.29 The highly
addictive nature of tobacco products makes it very difficult to
untangle the precise role of its social influences. For instance,
it is clear that social pressure plays a key part in smoking
adoption30; nevertheless when these influences disappear
or are recognised, a powerful addiction has been established. At this
new stage, social influences may still play an important part,
reinforcing the behaviour and some of its cognitive
determinants.31 The modern epidemic of smoking
consumption, can be seen as an example of the diffusion in a given
society of an "innovation"32 that would grow first
among men, reaching its peak after 30-40 years. After this peak there
would be a decrease, related to public awareness of the consequences of
tobacco use, which would start to be visible after that time,
especially regarding cancer. The epidemic among women would come
later,33 34 and would not eventually reach the same peak,
because of the "vicarious" effects of tobacco use seen in
men.4 Therefore, the epidemic of smoking would reflect the
importance of social influences, especially of social position, as
those groups who were the first to smoke
because of the "social" prestige of the innovation
are a few decades afterwards the first to
quit, because of awareness of its consequences. This hypothesis is
supported by many studies in European35 and other
developed countries like the United States, Australia and Canada that
report a higher prevalence of smokers among lower social classes and among those with lower education levels.1 5 36 37 In
contrast, in southern European countries, including Spain, the
differences between social classes are not so marked among men; while
women in higher classes smoke the most6 9 35 38 39
although smoking among women of lower classes has been increasing in
recent years.7 In addition, it is noteworthy that smoking
cessation rate (percentage of ex-smokers in relation to the total
number of smokers and ex-smokers) is higher in groups with highest
levels of education and in upper social classes in developed
countries.40 41 Our findings are consistent with this
pattern, as we found higher rates of smoking cessation among upper
social classes mainly in men.
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION
Spain is among the top 10 countries of the world in the
production of alcoholic beverages, particularly wine. Consumption of
wine in small amounts has long been part of everyday meals and is
socially accepted. In addition, initiation to alcoholic drinks usually
takes place within the family, in the context of social events and
family celebrations.42 Alcoholic beverages are cheap and
widely available, which facilitates an increased consumption, although
binge drinking (drinking fast for the sole purpose of getting drunk) is
less common than in northern European countries.43 The
most common pattern of consumption for the adult population is daily
drinking, with the youngest population increasing their consumption at
weekends.44 45 The type of beverage consumed is mainly
wine, although the pattern is changing to beer.46 47
In this study, men of upper classes were lighter drinkers, while among women, the higher classes declared greater consumption (both light and heavy drinkers). In a study done in the UK it was found that the prevalence of heavy drinkers among men is higher among manual workers, while the higher classes had more light and non-drinkers. In the case of women it was always the higher classes who drank more.2 This pattern has also been reported for Spain by social class in men9 and by educational level in men and women.48 However, other studies have found no association between alcohol consumption and social class49 or have found an association showing that people of higher social class drink more.50 One study in the north of Europe has detected a change in the excessive alcohol consumption by social class: in the 1960s or 1970s non-manual workers drank more, a pattern that reversed during the 1980s.51 To explain this pattern, a model of diffusion of new habits by social class or educational level has been used. New habits, in this case alcohol consumption, are initiated by upper social classes or by the more educated as it was in relation to tobacco consumption.32 Hupkens et al have described that people with higher education levels consume the new beverage type more often and in greater numbers compared with people of lower educational level. This pattern is maintained in both northern and southern European countries. These differences in the consumption of new alcoholic beverages indicate a diffusion of new habits initiated by the more educated people. Furthermore, differences in consumption between men and women are smaller among those with higher education levels than among those with lower, which could be explained because of the consumption of new beverages in higher education levels.52
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Leisure time physical activity is not one of the most important
activities that Spanish people do in their spare time, although they
consider that physical activity is important for good health and
recreation and it is an easy activity.53 Nevertheless, a decrease has been recently observed in the proportion of people who are
inactive in leisure time.9
The pattern of physical activity found among men in Barcelona, where people in higher classes undertake more leisure time physical activity (although not statistically significant), but less usual physical activity, has been previously described.3 54-56 In the UK it has been reported, using data from two health surveys, that higher classes perform more leisure time physical activity.1 2 Salonen et al describe how, in two Finnish cohorts participating in a health related project in North Karelia, education level was positively related with leisure time physical activity, and negatively with occupational physical activity.57 Ford et al give similar results using data from a telephone survey carried out in Pittsburgh to determine physical activity in higher and lower socioeconomic status populations.58
In fact, usual physical activity is mainly related to occupational physical activity among workers, and to activities of daily living among people that do not have a paid employment (for example, houseworkers). Hence it is reasonable to expect that persons in lower social classes perform more intense physical activity as this is implicit in their occupations.59 Even so, it should be pointed out that the proportions of people performing intense physical activity are relatively low in all social classes, because in industrialised societies jobs require less and less physical activity. As a result, physical activity is becoming more and more part of leisure time.60
LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSION
The possible limitations of information as declared in a health
interview survey should be mentioned. The validity of declarations about alcohol consumption is unknown, although there are some reports
suggesting that consumption is usually
under-declared.43 61 In fact the potential biases
affecting this study would arise if the declarations were differential
depending on social class, something that has not been studied in this
country. We do not, however, have any evidence that supports this hypothesis.
Social class was derived from current or last occupation of the interviewed, although 44% of women and 22% of men were classified with the occupation of the head of the household (housewives, unemployed, students, etc). In this regard it should be mentioned that the results were very similar when all people had assigned the social class of the head of the household.
It is also necessary to mention that the sample size was insufficient to find statistically significant associations in some cases (for example leisure time physical activity in men), but standardised percentages and OR indicate the main trends.
This study found that the group whose health related behaviours imply greatest risk is lower class men. Women in more disadvantaged social situations smoke less and drink less alcohol. These results suggest that health policies should take into account these patterns.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Conflicts of interest: none.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Blaxter M. Health and lifestyles. London: Routledge, 1990. |
| 2. | Townsend P, Davidson N, Whitehead M. Inequalities in health: The Black Report and The Health Divide. London: Penguin Books, 1988. [Medline] |
| 3. | Dishman RK, Sallis JF, Orenstein DR. The determinants of physical activity and exercise. Public Health Rep 1985;100:158-172. |
| 4. |
Lopez AD,
Collishaw EN,
Piha T. A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries.
Tobacco Control
1994;3:242-247 |
| 5. | Pierce JP. International comparisons of trends in cigarette smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 1989;79:152-157. |
| 6. | Graham I. Smoking prevalence among women in the European Community 1950-1990. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:243-254. |
| 7. | Nebot M, Borrell C, Ballestín M, et al. JR. Prevalencia y características asociadas al consumo de tabaco en población general en Barcelona entre 1983 y 1992. Rev Clín Esp 1996;196:359-364[Medline]. |
| 8. | Regidor E, Gutiérrez-Fisac JL, Rodríguez C. Diferencias y desigualdades en salud en España. Madrid: Díaz de Santos, 1994. |
| 9. | Navarro V, Benach J, y la Comisión científica de estudios de las desigualdades sociales en salud en España. Desigualdades sociales en salud en España. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo y The School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, 1996. [Medline] |
| 10. | Borrell C, Pasarín MI. The study of social inequalities in health in Spain. Where are we? J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:388-389. |
| 11. | Kunst AE, Groenhof F, Mackenbach JP, and the EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Occupational class and cause specific mortality in middle aged men in 11 European countries: comparison of population based studies. BMJ 1998;16:1636-1642. |
| 12. |
Arias A,
Rebagliato M,
Palumbo MA,
et al. Desigualdades en salud en Barcelona y Valencia.
Med Clín (Barc)
1993;100:281-287 |
| 13. |
Borrell C,
Arias A. Socio-economic factors and mortality in urban settings: the case of Barcelona (Spain).
J Epidemiol Community Health
1995;49:460-465 |
| 14. |
Borrell C,
Regidor R,
Arias LC,
et al. Inequalities in mortality according to educational level in two large southern european cities.
Int J Epidemiol
1999;28:58-63 |
| 15. | Borrell C, Plasència A, Pasarín I, et al. Widening social inequalities in mortality: the case of a southern European city (Barcelona). J Epidemiol Community Health 1997;51:659-667. |
| 16. | Borrell C, Arias A, Baranda L, et al. Manual de l'enquesta de salut de Barcelona. Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona, 1992. |
| 17. | Vilain C. The evaluation and monitoring of public action on tobacco. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (Smoke-free Europe 1988; Series, no 3). |
| 18. | Gobierno Vasco. Encuesta de salud de la Comunidad Autónoma Vasca. Serie Estadísticas y Documentos de Trabajo, no 14. Vitoria: Gobierno Vasco, 1988. |
| 19. | Welsh Heart Health Survey. 1985. Heartbeat Wales Technical Reports Number Two. Protocol and Questioannaire. Wales: Health promotion Authority for Wales, 1989. [Medline] |
| 20. | Domingo A, Marcos J. Propuesta de un indicador de la "clase social" basado en la ocupación. Gac Sanit 1989;3:320-326. |
| 21. | Grupo de trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología. La medición de la clase social en ciencias de la salud. Barcelona: SG Editores, 1995. |
| 22. | Borrell C. Evolució de les desigualtats socials en salut a la ciutat de Barcelona, 1983-92. [Doctoral dissertation]. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 1995. |
| 23. | Arber S, Lahelma E. Women, paid employment and ill-health in Britain and Finland. Acta Sociologica 1993;36:121-138. |
| 24. | Arber S. Comparing inequalities in women's and men's health. Britain in the 1990s. Soc Sci Med 1997;44:773-788[Medline]. |
| 25. | Anderson P, Cremona A, Paton A, et al. The risk of alcohol. Addiction 1993;88:1493-1508. |
| 26. | US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, International Medical Publishing, 1996. |
| 27. | Breslow EN, Day EN. Rates and rate standardization. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II: The design and analysis of cohort studies. Lyon: International Agency For Research on Cancer, 1987. |
| 28. | Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley, 1989. |
| 29. |
Tuya DM. Tabaco y adolescentes: más vale prevenir.
Med Clín (Barc)
1993;100:497-500 |
| 30. | McAlister A, Perry C, Maccoby N. Adolescent smoking: onset and prevention. Pediatrics 1979;63:650-658. |
| 31. | Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Towards a comprehensive model of change. In: Miller W, Heather N, eds. Treating addictive behaviors. New York: Plenum Press, 1986. |
| 32. | Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press, 1995. |
| 33. |
Waldron I. Patterns and causes of gender differences in smoking.
Soc Sci Med
1991;32:989-1005 |
| 34. | Amos A. Women and smoking. Br Med Bull 1996;52:74-89. |
| 35. | Cavelaars AEJM. Socio-economic differences in smoking in 12 European countries. Cavelaars AEJM. Cross-national comparisons of socio-economic differences in health indicators. [PhD thesis]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University, 1998;103-108. |
| 36. | Mackenback JP. Socio-economic health differences in the Netherlands: a review of recent empirical findings. Soc Sci Med 1992;34:213-226[Medline]. |
| 37. | Garfinkel L. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Prev Med 1997;26:447-450. |
| 38. | Hill C. Trends in tobacco use in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs 1992;12:21-24[Medline]. |
| 39. |
La Vechia C,
Pagano R,
Decarli A,
et al. Smoking in Italy, 1990-1991.
Tumori
1994;80:175-180 |
| 40. | Reek JV, Adriaanse H. Cigarette smoking cessation rates by level of education in five western countries. Int J Epidemiol 1988;17:474-475[Medline]. |
| 41. | Fernández E, Carné J, Schiaffino A, et al. El abandono del hábito tabáquico en Cataluña. Gac Sanit 1999;13:353-360[Medline]. |
| 42. | Ariza C, Nebot M. Factores asociados al consumo de tabaco en una muestra de escolares de enseñanza primaria y secundaria. Gac Sanit 1995;9:101-109. |
| 43. |
Gutiérrez-Fisac JL. Indicadores de consumo de alcohol en España.
Med Clín (Barc)
1995;104:544-550 |
| 44. | Alvarez FJ, Queipo D, Rio C, et al. Patterns of alcohol consumption among the general population of Castille and Leon (Spain). Alcohol Alcohol 1993;28:43-54. |
| 45. | Villalbí JR, Nebot M, Ballestín M. Los adolescentes ante las sustancias adictivas: tabaco, alcohol y drogas no institucionalizadas. Med Clín (Barc) 1995;104:784-788[Medline]. |
| 46. | Edwards G, Anderson P, Babor TF, et al. Alcohol policy and public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. |
| 47. | Alvarez FJ, del Rio MC. Alcohol and alcoholism in Spain. Alcologia 1992;4:259-266. |
| 48. | Regidor E, Gutiérrez-Fisac JL, Rodríguez C, et al. Las desigualdades sociales y la salud en España. Navarro C, Cabasés JM, Tormo MJ. La salud y el sistema sanitario en España. Informe SESPAS 1995. Barcelona: SG Editores, 1995;19-44. |
| 49. | Dunbar GC, Morgan DDV. The changing pattern of alcohol consumption in England and Wales 1978-85. BMJ 1987;295:807-810. |
| 50. | Rice N, Carr-Hill R, Dixon P, et al. The influence of households on drinking behaviour: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:971-979[Medline]. |
| 51. | Romelsjö A, Lundberg M. The changes in the social class distribution of moderate and high alcohol consumption and of alcohol-related disabilities over time in Stockolm County and in Sweden. Addiction 1996;91:1307-1323[Medline]. |
| 52. | Hupkens CLH, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ. Alcohol consumption in the European Community: uniformity and diversity in drinking patterns. Addiction 1993;88:1391-1404. |
| 53. | Vázquez B. Actitudes y prácticas deportivas de las mujeres españolas. Madrid: Instituto de la Mujer, 1993. [Medline] |
| 54. | Stephens T, Jacobs DR, White CC. A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity. Public Health Rep 1985;100:147-158[Medline]. |
| 55. |
Pomerleau J,
Pederson LL,
Ostbye T,
et al. Health behaviours and socio-economic status in Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Epidemiol
1997;13:613-622 |
| 56. |
Iribarren C,
Luepker RV,
McGovern PG,
et al. Twelve-year trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Minessota Heart Survey.
Arch Intern Med
1997;157:873-881 |
| 57. |
Salonen JT,
Slater JS,
Tuomilehto J,
et al. Leisure time and occupational physical activity: risk of death from ischemic heart disease.
Am J Epidemiol
1988;127:87-94 |
| 58. | Ford ES, Merritt RK, Heath GW, et al. Physical activity behaviors in lower and higher socioeconomic status populations. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:1246-1256[Medline]. |
| 59. |
Domínguez-Berjón MF,
Borrell C,
Nebot M,
et al. Actividad física habitual de la población residente en la ciudad de Barcelona.
Gac Sanit
1998;12:100-109 |
| 60. | Pate RR, Prat M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recomendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995;273:402-407. |
| 61. | Hellerstedt WL, Jeffery RW, Murray DM. The association between alcohol intake and adiposity in the general population. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:595-611 |
© 2000 by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cornelio, C I, Garcia, M, Schiaffino, A, Borres, J M, Nieto, F J, Fernandez, E, for the CHIS.FU Study Group,
(2008). Changes in leisure time and occupational physical activity over 8 years: the Cornelle Health Interview Survey Follow-Up Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
62: 239-244
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Rohlfs, I., Borrell, C., Artazcoz, L., Escriba-Aguir, V.
(2007). The incorporation of gender perspective into Spanish health surveys. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
61: ii20-ii25
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Piko, B. F., Fitzpatrick, K. M.
(2007). Socioeconomic Status, Psychosocial Health and Health Behaviours among Hungarian Adolescents. Eur J Public Health
17: 353-360
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Siahpush, M., English, D., Powles, J.
(2006). The contribution of smoking to socioeconomic differentials in mortality: results from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, Australia.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
60: 1077-1079
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
