Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004;58:929-930; doi:10.1136/jech.2003.016972
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004;58:929-930
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

SHORT REPORT

Does rear seat belt use vary according to socioeconomic status?

Frances Colgan1, Amy Gospel1, Jo Petrie1, Jean Adams2, Peter Heywood2 and Martin White2

1 The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 School of Population and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M White
School of Population and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK; martin.white@ncl.ac.uk

Accepted 16 February 2004

Abbreviations: SES, socioeconomic status; RSP, rear seat passenger

Keywords: health promotion; seat belts; socioeconomic status

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Policy measures, including legislation, are one method of promoting health. Participation in many voluntary health promoting behaviours is strongly socioeconomically patterned,1 and this may also apply to behaviours governed by legislation.

Rear passenger seat belt use is one legally prescribed behaviour—having been made compulsory in the UK in 1991. Previous research on the socioeconomic distribution of seat belt use has relied on self reported behaviours and is therefore subject to response bias, has focused on driver seat belt use, or has been undertaken in the USA where legislation is different from the UK.2,3

We conducted the first UK based observational study to investigate the association between rear passenger seat belt use and socioeconomic status (SES), using car value as a proxy measure of SES.


METHODS AND RESULTS

We observed 1032 rear seat passengers (RSPs) in 773 cars at six locations with slow car flow (for example, roundabouts and junctions) in Newcastle upon Tyne, . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Is there a promiscuous 10% underlying the epidemic of sexually transmitted disease?
Carlos Álvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004 58: 885. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs