SHORT REPORT

Smoking cessation services are reducing inequalities

H Lowey¹, K Tocque², M A Bellis¹, B Fullard³

¹ Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
² North West Public Health Observatory, Liverpool John Moores University
³ Directorate of Health and Social Care (North), Government Office North West, Manchester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr H L Lowey, Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, 70 Great Crosshall Street, Liverpool L3 2AB,UK;
H.L.Lowey@livjm.ac.uk

Accepted 5 February 2003

Keywords: smoking; tobacco; inequalities; deprivation

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The recent introduction of the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill¹ follows a whole range of strategies and subsequent interventions aimed at reducing levels of smoking in the UK. In particular, Smoking kills: a white paper on tobacco² has resulted in national investments to develop smoking cessation services both in primary care and through specialist services elsewhere. National guidance on providing such services recommended developing them to meet the needs of local populations and consequently smoking cessation services within each health authority have adopted different delivery models.

Although smoking is an important threat to health across all demographics, it disproportionately affects the most deprived³ and contributes to the gap in life expectancy between those most in need and those most advantaged more than any other identifiable factor. Thus, while the proportion of smokers in more advantaged groups is estimated at 15% for males and 13% for females in the most deprived . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

MENTAL HEALTH, UNEMPLOYMENT, TOBACCO, WASTE, AND PIGS

John R Ashton, Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
J Epidemiol Community Health 2003 57: 545. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hiscock, R, Pearce, J, Barnett, R, Moon, G, Daley, V (2009). Do smoking cessation programmes influence geographical inequalities in health? An evaluation of the impact of the PEGS programme in Christchurch, New Zealand. Tobacco Control 18: 371-376 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murray, R. L., Bauld, L., Hackshaw, L. E., McNeill, A. (2009). Improving access to smoking cessation services for disadvantaged groups: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 31: 258-277 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schaap, M M, Kunst, A E, Leinsalu, M, Regidor, E, Ekholm, O, Dzurova, D, Helmert, U, Klumbiene, J, Santana, P, Mackenbach, J P (2008). Effect of nationwide tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in high and low educated groups in 18 European countries. Tobacco Control 17: 248-255 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Challenger, A., Coleman, T., Lewis, S. (2007). Predicting default from smoking cessation treatment following enrolment. Health Education Journal 66: 32-43 [Abstract]  
• Blakely, T., Wilson, N. (2005). The contribution of smoking to inequalities in mortality by education varies over time and by sex: two national cohort studies, 1981-84 and 1996-99. Int J Epidemiol 34: 1054-1062 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Adams, J, White, M, Lowey, H L, Fullard, B, Bellis, M, Tocque, K (2004). Smoking cessation services may not reduce inequalities. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 158-159 [Full Text]