J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 July 2008

J Epidemiol Community Health. Published Online First: 1 May 2008. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.071894
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jech.2007.071894v1
62/7/647    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovasi, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rundle, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovasi, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rundle, A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

SHORT REPORTS

Children living in areas with more street trees have lower asthma prevalence

Gina Schellenbaum Lovasi, James W Quinn, Kathryn M Neckerman, Matthew S Perzanowski, Andrew Rundle

Columbia University, United States

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gl2225{at}columbia.edu


ABSTRACT
Introduction: Childhood asthma prevalence in the US increased by 50% from 1980 to 2000, with especially high prevalence in poor urban communities.

Methods: Asthma prevalence among children ages 4-5 years old and asthma hospitalizations among children less than 15 years old were available for 42 health service catchment areas within New York City. Street tree counts were provided by the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation. We also measured proximity to pollution sources, socio-demographic characteristics, and population density for each area.

Results: Controlling for potential confounders, an increase in tree density of one standard deviation (SD: 343 trees/km2) was associated with a lower asthma prevalence (relative risk [RR]: 0.71 per SD of tree density; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.64-0.79), but not asthma hospitalizations (RR: 0.89 per SD of tree density; 95% CI: 0.75-1.06).

Conclusions: Street trees were associated with a lower prevalence of early childhood asthma. Our study does not permit inference that trees are causally related to asthma at the individual-level. The PlaNYC sustainability initiative, which includes a commitment to plant one million trees by the year 2017, offers an opportunity for a large prospective evaluation.



Related Article

In this issue
Mauricio L Barreto
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008 62: 569. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.