Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2009;63:38-44
RESEARCH REPORTS
Gender, health inequalities and welfare state regimes: a cross-national study of 13 European countries
1 Department of Geography, University of Durham, UK
2 Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, UK
3 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands
Correspondence to:
Dr C Bambra, Department of Geography, Wolfson Research Institute, Queens Campus, Durham University, Stockton on Tees TS17 6BH, UK; clare.bambra{at}durham.ac.uk
Background: This study is the first to examine the relationship between gender and self-assessed health (SAH), and the extent to which this varies by socioeconomic position in different European welfare state regimes (Liberal, Corporatist, Social Democratic, Southern).
Methods: The EUROTHINE harmonised data set (based on representative cross-sectional national health surveys conducted between 1998 and 2004) was used to analyse SAH differences by gender and socioeconomic position (educational rank) in different welfare states. The sample sizes ranged from 7124 (Germany) to 118 245 (Italy) and concerned the adult population (aged
16 years).
Results: Logistic regression analysis (adjusting for age) identified significant gender differences in SAH in nine European welfare states. In the UK (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99) and Finland (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.95), men were significantly more likely to report "bad" or "very bad" health. In Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Holland, Italy, Spain and Portugal, a significantly higher proportion of women than men reported that their health was "bad" or "very bad". The increased risk of poor SAH experienced by women from these countries ranged from a 23% increase in Denmark (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.39) to more than a twofold increase in Portugal (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.87 to 2.15). For some countries (Italy, Portugal, Sweden), womens relatively worse SAH tended to be most prominent in the group with the highest level of education.
Discussion: Women in the Social Democratic and Southern welfare states were more likely to report worse SAH than men. In the Corporatist countries, there were no gender differences in SAH. There was no consistent welfare state regime patterning for gender differences in SAH by socioeconomic position. These findings constitute a challenge to regime theory and comparative social epidemiology to engage more with issues of gender.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sanders, A E, Slade, G D, John, M T, Steele, J G, Suominen-Taipale, A L, Lahti, S, Nuttall, N M, Allen, P F.
(2009). A cross-national comparison of income gradients in oral health quality of life in four welfare states: application of the Korpi and Palme typology. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
63: 569-574
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
