J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008;62:701-707; doi:10.1136/jech.2007.065243
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Mourad, T
Right arrow Articles by Philalithis, A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Mourad, T
Right arrow Articles by Philalithis, A
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

RESEARCH REPORTS

Individual determinants of primary healthcare utilisation in Gaza Strip, Palestine

T Abu-Mourad1,2, A Alegakis1, S Shashaa3, A Koutis1, C Lionis1, A Philalithis1

1 Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece
2 Minister’s Office, Ministry of Health, Palestine
3 Faculty of Public Health, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine

Correspondence to:
Dr T Abu-Mourad, Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, PO Box 2208, Heraklion 71003, Crete, Greece; tayserm{at}hotmail.com

Objectives: To examine the extent to which primary care patients are using the primary healthcare (PHC) services in Gaza Strip, Palestine, and to determine the factors that are associated with the use of these services.

Methods: Using Andersen’s behavioural model, the authors interviewed 956 PHC attendees. Patients were questioned about predisposing factors: age, sex, marital status, education, work status, household size, life events (psychological and financial), perceived living conditions and health locus of control. Enabling factors included urbanisation and household income. Need factors included self-rated health. Healthy lifestyle was measured by two variables: smoking and physical activity. Outcome factors were measured by patients’ satisfaction with PHC.

Results: The study revealed that the majority of interviewed patients (64.7%) reported high use (>3 times per 6 months) of PHC within the 6-month period before the interview. The main factors found to be associated with high use of PHC were older age, married and divorced/widowed status, perceived bad living conditions, not working, high level of income, poorly rated health status and current smoking habit.

Conclusions: Gazean primary care patients are high users of PHC services. The increased use of these services is associated with the basic predisposing, enabling and needs factors and with the unique bad living conditions. Tobacco use was another aspect associated with high use of PHC. Effective health management, based on promoting a healthy lifestyle, is needed. The findings of this study can be used to improve health service planning and guide decision-makers towards healthcare resource allocation according to healthcare needs.



Relevant Article

In this issue
Mauricio L Barreto
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008 62: 665. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.