Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008;62:513-521; doi:10.1136/jech.2007.061069
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH REPORTS

Reproductive life events in the population living in the vicinity of a nuclear waste reprocessing plant

R Slama1,2,3, O Boutou1,2,3,4, B Ducot1,2,3, A Spira3

1 INSERM, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 822 "Epidémiologie, Démographie et Sciences Sociales", IFR69 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
2 INED, National Institute of Demographic Studies, Paris, France
3 Universite Paris-Sud, F-94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
4 InVS, Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Department of Occupational Health, Saint-Maurice, France

Correspondence to:
Dr R Slama, Avenir team "Environmental Epidemiology applied to Fecundity and Reproduction", INSERM U823/Institut Albert Bonniot, BP 170, F-38042 Grenoble Cedex, France; Remy.slama{at}ujf-grenoble.fr

Objective: There is concern about the health of populations living close to nuclear waste reprocessing plants. A comparative study was conducted on reproductive life events in the general population living near the nuclear waste reprocessing plant in Beaumont-Hague, France and a reference area in Brittany.

Design, setting and participants: Women were randomly selected and retrospectively questioned on reproductive life events occurring between 1985 and 2000. The monthly probability of pregnancy (assessed by time to pregnancy for pregnancy attempts leading or not to a live birth), occurrence of involuntary infertility, miscarriage and birth weight were compared between both areas using regression models with random effect.

Results: Compared with the reference area (326 couples) and after adjustment for sociodemographic and behavioural factors, couples from Beaumont-Hague (857 couples) had an estimated hazard ratio of pregnancy of 1.19 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.58). The prevalence ratio of 12-month involuntary infertility was 0.99 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.55) and the odds ratio of miscarriage was 0.86 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.33) for Beaumont-Hague, compared with the reference area. Mean birth weight was similar in both areas (95% CI of difference –85 g to 53 g).

Conclusion: No increased risk of adverse reproductive life events was highlighted in the population living in the vicinity of the French nuclear waste reprocessing plant, compared with the reference area. Reproductive health is unlikely to be strongly altered in the general population of Beaumont-Hague.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue
Mauricio L Barreto
J Epidemiol Community Health 2008 62: 473. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs