Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008;62:338-341; doi:10.1136/jech.2007.062315
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY AND PRACTICE

When does work stress hurt? Testing the interaction with socioeconomic position in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study

N Wege1, N Dragano1, R Erbel2, K-H Jockel3, S Moebus3, A Stang4 and J Siegrist1

1 Department of Medical Sociology, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
2 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
3 Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Essen and Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
4 Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry and Informatics, Medical Faculty, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

Correspondence to:
Dr N Wege, Department of Medical Sociology, University of Duesseldorf, PO Box 10 10 07, D-40001 Duesseldorf, Germany; natalia.wege{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

Study objective: To study systematically the separate and combined effects of work stress and socioeconomic position on three measures of health in an unselected working population.

Design: Two exposures (high demand/low control ("job strain"); effort–reward imbalance at work) are related to angina pectoris, depression, and poor self-rated health in a cross-sectional study design in which socioeconomic position was measured by occupational position and educational level.

Setting: Baseline data of a prospective population-based cohort study in Germany, collected between 2000 and 2003.

Participants: 1749 employed or self-employed men and women (36.3% of total sample) aged 45–65 years.

Main results: Effort–reward imbalance and job strain were associated with elevated odds ratios of all three health measures, using logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of poorer health was always highest in subgroups defined by high work stress and low socioeconomic position, with respective odds ratios ranging from 2.30 to 2.98 (95% CI 1.38 to 4.52) for self-rated health, 1.70 to 2.24 (95% CI 1.04 to 3.88) for angina and 2.61 to 8.20 (95% CI 1.53 to 14.15) for depression.

Conclusion: Although stress at work was related to poorer health in the total study group, the strongest associations were consistently observed in men and women with low educational level or low occupational position. Worksite health promotion should be directed primarily towards these target groups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2008 62: 281. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs