J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008;62:318-324; doi:10.1136/jech.2006.058768
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v62,p472)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pickett, K E
Right arrow Articles by Wakschlag, L S
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pickett, K E
Right arrow Articles by Wakschlag, L S
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY AND PRACTICE

Meaningful differences in maternal smoking behaviour during pregnancy: implications for infant behavioural vulnerability

K E Pickett1, C Wood1, J Adamson1, L DeSouza1, L S Wakschlag2

1 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
2 Institute for Juvenile Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr Kate E Pickett, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Area 3, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; kp6{at}york.ac.uk

Background: Smoking during pregnancy has been consistently associated with risk of problem behaviour in offspring. There is debate about whether this association reflects a teratological effect or is a marker for problematic maternal characteristics. We test these "competing" hypotheses by examining whether (1) exposure is associated with an early risk pathway by testing its association with infant temperamental difficultness, and (2) whether pregnancy quitting is associated with an early protective pathway, testing its association with easy infant temperament.

Methods: We used the 9-month-old sweep of the Millennium Cohort Study, a cohort of over 18 000 infants born in 2000–2. Mothers were classified as pregnancy non-smokers, quitters and light or heavy smokers. Temperamental positive mood, receptivity to novelty and regularity were assessed with the Carey Infant Temperament Scale.

Results: Pregnancy quitters had infants with the highest scores of easy temperament and heavy smokers had infants with the lowest scores (F = 28.51, p<0.001). Pregnancy smoking also predicted difficult temperament: heavy smoking was associated with increased risk of low positive mood (OR = 1.17, p = 0.09). In contrast, pregnancy quitting exerted a protective effect with decreased risk of distress to novelty (OR = 0.79, p<0.01) and irregularity (OR = 0.89, p = 0.02) in these infants.

Conclusions: Pathways from pregnancy smoking to offspring behaviour are complex and multi-determined. These findings suggest that both exposure and maternal characteristics associated with pregnancy smoking status contribute to offspring behavioural patterns. Research that characterises differences between quitters and persistent smokers and examines the role of these differences in prediction of early vulnerabilities and problems in adaptation over time will be important for elucidating these pathways.



Related Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008 62: 281. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
No Ifs, Ands, or Butts: Quitting Smoking During Pregnancy Might Help Infant Temperament
Journal Watch Women's Health, April 24, 2008; 2008(424): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.