EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY AND PRACTICE
Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities initiative
1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
2 Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3 Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
4 Division of Public Health, School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Correspondence to:
M Stafford, UCL, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK; m.stafford{at}ucl.ac.uk
Objective: To assess health improvement and differential changes in health across various sociodemographic groups in neighbourhood renewal areas.
Design and setting: A longitudinal survey of 10 390 residents in New Deal for Communities (NDC) areas and 977 residents in comparator areas in England.
Measures and methods: Changes on several outcomes across five domains (health, unemployment, education, crime and the physical environment) were assessed by sex, age, educational and ethnic group.
Results: Small overall improvements were seen on all domains in NDC areas but similar improvements were also seen in comparator areas. In NDC areas, higher educational groups were more likely to stop smoking, less likely to develop a limiting long-term illness, more likely to find employment and more likely to participate in education or training (p for trend <0.05). Older people and women were less likely to find employment and experienced smaller increases in income. These patterns were generally mirrored in comparator areas, although the education gradient in participation in education or training was less steep in NDC areas.
Conclusions: Evidence from two-year follow-up does not support an NDC effect, either overall or for particular population groups. Residents with lower education experienced the least favourable health profiles at baseline and the smallest improvements. Programme leaders should consider how to encourage participation among those with the lowest education. A shallower social gradient in participation in education and training in NDC areas and a lack of gradient in income, crime and environmental outcomes indicate that some aspects of the programme may be reaching all sections of the community.
Relevant Article
- In this issue
- Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2008 62: 281.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Smith, K. E., Bambra, C., Joyce, K. E., Perkins, N., Hunter, D. J., Blenkinsopp, E. A.
(2009). Partners in health? A systematic review of the impact of organizational partnerships on public health outcomes in England between 1997 and 2008. J Public Health (Oxf)
31: 210-221
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
