J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61:689-694; doi:10.1136/jech.2006.047746
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mytton, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rutter, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mytton, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rutter, H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Could targeted food taxes improve health?

Oliver Mytton1, Alastair Gray2, Mike Rayner3, Harry Rutter4

1 Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
2 Department of Public Health, University of Oxford Old Road Campus, Health Economics Research Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK
3 Department of Public Health, University of Oxford Old Road Campus, British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, Headington, Oxford, UK
4 South East Public Health Observatory, 4150 Chancellor Court, Oxford Business Park, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr O Mytton
Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; olivermytton{at}doctors.org.uk

Objective: To examine the effects on nutrition, health and expenditure of extending value added tax (VAT) to a wider range of foods in the UK.

Method: A model based on consumption data and elasticity values was constructed to predict the effects of extending VAT to certain categories of food. The resulting changes in demand, expenditure, nutrition and health were estimated. Three different tax regimens were examined: (1) taxing the principal sources of dietary saturated fat; (2) taxing foods defined as unhealthy by the SSCg3d nutrient scoring system; and (3) taxing foods in order to obtain the best health outcome.

Data: Consumption patterns and elasticity data were taken from the National Food Survey of Great Britain. The health effects of changing salt and fat intake were from previous meta-analyses.

Results: (1) Taxing only the principal sources of dietary saturated fat is unlikely to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease because the reduction in saturated fat is offset by a rise in salt consumption. (2) Taxing unhealthy foods, defined by SSCg3d score, might avert around 2300 deaths per annum, primarily by reducing salt intake. (3) Taxing a wider range of foods could avert up to 3200 cardiovascular deaths in the UK per annum (a 1.7% reduction).

Conclusions: Taxing foodstuffs can have unpredictable health effects if cross-elasticities of demand are ignored. A carefully targeted fat tax could produce modest but meaningful changes in food consumption and a reduction in cardiovascular disease.


Abbreviations: IHD, ischaemic heart disease; VAT, value added tax


Related Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007 61: 657. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



eLetters:

Read all eLetters

The best recipe? Combining food taxes with subsidies on healthy foods
Nick Wilson, et al.
J Epidemiol Community Health Online, 28 Aug 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.