HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by De Vogli, R. Articles by Marmot, M. G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by De Vogli, R. Articles by Marmot, M. G Topic Collections Editor's choice Related Article

Unfairness and health: evidence from the Whitehall II Study

¹ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, International Institute for Society and Health, University College London, London, UK
² Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R De Vogli
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, International Institute for Society and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK; r.devogli{at}ucl.ac.uk

Objective: To examine the effects of unfairness on incident coronary events and health functioning.

Design: Prospective cohort study. Unfairness, sociodemographics, established coronary risk factors (high serum cholesterol, hypertension, obesity, exercise, smoking and alcohol consumption) and other psychosocial work characteristics (job strain, effort–reward imbalance and organisational justice) were measured at baseline. Associations between unfairness and incident coronary events and health functioning were determined over an average follow-up of 10.9 years.

Participants: 5726 men and 2572 women from 20 civil service departments in London (the Whitehall II Study).

Main outcome measures: Incident fatal coronary heart disease, non-fatal myocardial infarction and angina (528 events) and health functioning.

Results: Low employment grade is strongly associated with unfairness. Participants reporting higher levels of unfairness are more likely to experience an incident coronary event (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.17), after adjustment for age, gender, employment grade, established coronary risk factors and other work-related psychosocial characteristics. Unfairness is also associated with poor physical (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.77) and mental (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.99) functioning at follow-up, controlling for all other factors and health functioning at baseline.

Conclusions: Unfairness is an independent predictor of increased coronary events and impaired health functioning. Further research is needed to disentangle the effects of unfairness from other psychosocial constructs and to investigate the societal, relational and biological mechanisms that may underlie its associations with health and heart disease.

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; SF-36, Short-Form 36 Health Survey

Related Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007 61: 465. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Lutgen-Sandvik Intensive Remedial Identity Work: Responses to Workplace Bullying Trauma and Stigmatization Organization, January 1, 2008; 15(1): 97 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]