J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61:385-388; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.042598
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olowokure, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olowokure, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, A.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Mumps and the media: changes in the reporting of mumps in response to newspaper coverage

Babatunde Olowokure1, Lilian Clark1, Alex J Elliot2, Douglas Harding3, Ann Fleming4

1 Health Protection Agency, Regional Surveillance Unit (West Midlands), Birmingham, UK
2 Birmingham Research Unit of the Royal College of General Practitioners, Lordswood, Harborne, Birmingham, UK
3 Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, UK
4 Health Protection Agency, West Midlands, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Olowokure
Health Protection Agency, Regional Surveillance Unit (West Midlands), 9th Floor, Ladywood House, 45 Stephenson Street, Birmingham B2 4DY, UK; babatunde.olowokure{at}hpa.org.uk

Objective: To determine the links between national newspaper coverage of mumps after a press release and increased reports of clinical mumps cases.

Design and setting: A cross sectional study involving people aged 15–24 years in the West Midlands, and England and Wales. Reported mumps cases were obtained from statutory notifications of infectious diseases to the Health Protection Agency and reports to the Royal College of General Practitioners Weekly Returns Service. Data on newspaper coverage was obtained by retrospectively reviewing the Health Protection Agency press archives.

Main outcome measure: The effect of newspaper coverage was assessed by examining the 4 weeks before the press release (weeks 15–18 of the year), a 2-week period that included the week of the press release (weeks 19–20) and 4 weeks after the press release (weeks 21–24).

Main results: Mumps notification rates were declining before increased newspaper coverage. Significant increases in national (from 28.3/100 000 population (95% CI 26.5 to 30.1) in weeks 18 to 42.8 (95% CI 40.6 to 45) in week 20) and local (from 9.8 (95% CI 7.4 to 12.1) to 21.2 (95% CI 17.7 to 24.6)) notification rates were seen after increased newspaper coverage. Reports rapidly declined after decreased media interest.

Conclusions: The reported incidence rate of mumps seems to be markedly influenced by the level of newspaper coverage. This has implications for surveillance activities.


Abbreviations: HPA, Health Protection Agency; NOID, notifications of infectious disease; RCGP, Royal College of General Practitioners; WRS, Weekly Returns Service


Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007 61: 369. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
BMJ press release led to increase in mumps notification
BMJ, June 9, 2007; 334(7605): 1189 - 1189.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.