Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61:385-388; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.042598
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Mumps and the media: changes in the reporting of mumps in response to newspaper coverage

Babatunde Olowokure1, Lilian Clark1, Alex J Elliot2, Douglas Harding3 and Ann Fleming4

1 Health Protection Agency, Regional Surveillance Unit (West Midlands), Birmingham, UK
2 Birmingham Research Unit of the Royal College of General Practitioners, Lordswood, Harborne, Birmingham, UK
3 Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, UK
4 Health Protection Agency, West Midlands, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr B Olowokure
Health Protection Agency, Regional Surveillance Unit (West Midlands), 9th Floor, Ladywood House, 45 Stephenson Street, Birmingham B2 4DY, UK; babatunde.olowokure{at}hpa.org.uk

Objective: To determine the links between national newspaper coverage of mumps after a press release and increased reports of clinical mumps cases.

Design and setting: A cross sectional study involving people aged 15–24 years in the West Midlands, and England and Wales. Reported mumps cases were obtained from statutory notifications of infectious diseases to the Health Protection Agency and reports to the Royal College of General Practitioners Weekly Returns Service. Data on newspaper coverage was obtained by retrospectively reviewing the Health Protection Agency press archives.

Main outcome measure: The effect of newspaper coverage was assessed by examining the 4 weeks before the press release (weeks 15–18 of the year), a 2-week period that included the week of the press release (weeks 19–20) and 4 weeks after the press release (weeks 21–24).

Main results: Mumps notification rates were declining before increased newspaper coverage. Significant increases in national (from 28.3/100 000 population (95% CI 26.5 to 30.1) in weeks 18 to 42.8 (95% CI 40.6 to 45) in week 20) and local (from 9.8 (95% CI 7.4 to 12.1) to 21.2 (95% CI 17.7 to 24.6)) notification rates were seen after increased newspaper coverage. Reports rapidly declined after decreased media interest.

Conclusions: The reported incidence rate of mumps seems to be markedly influenced by the level of newspaper coverage. This has implications for surveillance activities.

Abbreviations: HPA, Health Protection Agency; NOID, notifications of infectious disease; RCGP, Royal College of General Practitioners; WRS, Weekly Returns Service


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 369. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • (2007). BMJ press release led to increase in mumps notification. BMJ 334: 1189-1189 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs