EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study

Kylie Ball¹, Anna Timperio¹, Jo Salmon¹, Billie Giles-Corti², Rebecca Roberts¹ and David Crawford¹

¹ Deakin Univeristy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
² University of WA, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr K Ball
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood Vic 3125, Australia;kball{at}deakin.edu.au

Objective: To investigate the contribution of personal, social and environmental factors to mediating socioeconomic (educational) inequalities in women’s leisure-time walking and walking for transport.

Methods: A community sample of 1282 women provided survey data on walking for leisure and transport; educational level; enjoyment of, and self-efficacy for, walking; physical activity barriers and intentions; social support for physical activity; sporting/recreational club membership; dog ownership; and perceived environmental aesthetics and safety. These data were linked with objective environmental data on the density of public open space and walking tracks in the women’s local neighbourhood, coastal proximity and street connectivity.

Results: Multilevel modelling showed that different personal, social and environmental factors were associated with walking for leisure and walking for transport. Variables from all three domains explained (mediated) educational inequalities in leisure-time walking, including neighbourhood walking tracks; coastal proximity; friends’ social support; dog ownership; self-efficacy, enjoyment and intentions. On the other hand, few of the variables examined explained educational variations in walking for transport, exceptions being neighbourhood, coastal proximity, street connectivity and social support from family.

Conclusions: Public health initiatives aimed at promoting, and reducing educational inequalities in, leisure-time walking should incorporate a focus on environmental strategies, such as advocating for neighbourhood walking tracks, as well as personal and social factors. Further investigation is required to better understand the pathways by which education might influence walking for transport.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 89. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Janssen, E., Sugiyama, T., Winkler, E., de Vries, H., te Poel, F., Owen, N. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of leisure-time walking among Australian adults of lower and higher socio-economic status. Health Educ Res 0: cyp012v1-cyp012 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cleland, V. J., Ball, K., Salmon, J., Timperio, A. F., Crawford, D. A. (2008). Personal, social and environmental correlates of resilience to physical inactivity among women from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Health Educ Res 0: cyn054v1-cyn054 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gauvin, L., Riva, M., Barnett, T., Richard, L., Craig, C. L., Spivock, M., Laforest, S., Laberge, S., Fournel, M.-C., Gagnon, H., Gagne, S. (2008). Association between Neighborhood Active Living Potential and Walking. Am J Epidemiol 167: 944-953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Inglis, V, Ball, K, Crawford, D (2008). Socioeconomic variations in women's diets: what is the role of perceptions of the local food environment?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 191-197 [Abstract] [Full Text]