Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61:1010-1013; doi:10.1136/jech.2007.061747
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

THEORY AND METHODS

Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy

Jon Nicholl

Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence to:
Jon Nicholl, Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; j.nicholl{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Observational studies comparing groups or populations to evaluate services or interventions usually require case-mix adjustment to account for imbalances between the groups being compared. Simulation studies have, however, shown that case-mix adjustment can make any bias worse.

One reason this can happen is if the risk factors used in the adjustment are related to the risk in different ways in the groups or populations being compared, and ignoring this commits the "constant risk fallacy".

Case-mix adjustment is particularly prone to this problem when the adjustment uses factors that are proxies for the real risk factors.

Interactions between risk factors and groups should always be examined before case-mix adjustment in observational studies.

Abbreviations: NRCT, non-randomised controlled trial; RTA, road traffic accident


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

IN THIS ISSUE
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 929. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Aylin, P., Bottle, A., Jarman, B. (2009). Monitoring mortality. BMJ 338: b1745-b1745 [Full Text]  
  • Wright, J., Shojania, K. G (2009). Measuring the quality of hospital care. BMJ 338: b569-b569 [Full Text]  
  • Mohammed, M. A, Deeks, J. J, Girling, A., Rudge, G., Carmalt, M., Stevens, A. J, Lilford, R. J (2009). Evidence of methodological bias in hospital standardised mortality ratios: retrospective database study of English hospitals. BMJ 338: b780-b780 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs