EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

The population effect of crime and neighbourhood on physical activity: an analysis of 15 461 adults

Roger A Harrison¹, Islay Gemmell², Richard F Heller²

¹ Bolton Primary Care Trust, Bolton, UK
² Evidence for Population Health Unit, Epidemiology & Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R A Harrison
Evidence for Population Health Unit, Epidemiology & Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; roger.harrison{at}manchester.ac.uk

Area-based interventions offer the potential to increase physical activity for many sedentary people in countries such as the UK. Evidence on the effect of individual and area/neighbourhood influences on physical activity is in its infancy, and despite its value to policy makers a population focus is rarely used. Data from a population-based health and lifestyle survey of adults in northwest England were used to analyse associations between individual and neighbourhood perceptions and physical activity. The population effect of eliminating a risk factor was expressed as a likely effect on population levels of physical activity. Of the 15 461 responders, 21 923 (27.1%) were physically active. Neighbourhood perceptions of leisure facilities were associated with physical activity, but no association was found for sense of belonging, public transport or shopping facilities. People who felt safe in their neighbourhood were more likely to be physically active, but no associations were found for vandalism, assaults, muggings or experience of crime. The number of physically active people would increase by 3290 if feelings of "unsafe" during the day were removed, and by 11 237 if feelings of "unsafe" during the night were removed. An additional 8342 people would be physically active if everyone believed that they were "very well placed for leisure facilities". Feeling safe had the potential largest effect on population levels of physical activity. Strategies to increase physical activity in the population need to consider the wider determinants of health-related behaviour, including fear of crime and safety.

Abbreviations: PIM, population impact measure

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet, John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Franzini, L., Elliott, M. N., Cuccaro, P., Schuster, M., Gilliland, M. J., Grunbaum, J. A., Franklin, F., Tortolero, S. R. (2009). Influences of Physical and Social Neighborhood Environments on Children's Physical Activity and Obesity. AJPH 99: 271-278 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Torun, P., Heller, R. F., Verma, A. (2009). Potential population impact of changes in heroin treatment and smoking prevalence rates: using Population Impact Measures. Eur J Public Health 19: 28-31 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bjork, J, Albin, M, Grahn, P, Jacobsson, H, Ardo, J, Wadbro, J, Ostergren, P-O, Skarback, E (2008). Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: e2-e2 [Abstract] [Full Text]