Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60(Supplement 2):ii7-ii12; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.045583
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH REPORT

Pathways of disadvantage and smoking careers: evidence and policy implications

Hilary Graham1, Hazel M Inskip2, Brian Francis3, Juliet Harman3

1 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
2 MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, UK
3 Centre for Applied Statistics, Lancaster University, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor H Graham
University of York, Area 2, Seebohm Rowntree Building, York YO30 6AS, UK; hmg501{at}york.ac.uk

Objectives: To investigate in older industrialised societies (a) how social disadvantage contributes to smoking risk among women (b) the role of social and economic policies in reducing disadvantage and moderating wider inequalities in life chances and living standards.

Methods: Review and analysis of (a) the effects of disadvantage in childhood and into adulthood on women’s smoking status in early adulthood (b) policy impacts on the social exposures associated with high smoking risk.

Main results: (a) Smoking status—ever smoking, current smoking, heavy smoking, and cessation—is influenced not only by current circumstances but by longer term biographies of disadvantage (b) social and economic policies shape key social predictors of women’s smoking status, including childhood circumstances, educational levels and adult circumstances, and moderate inequalities in the distribution of these dimensions of life chances and living standards. Together, the two sets of findings argue for a policy toolkit that acts on the distal determinants of smoking, with interventions targeting the conditions in which future and current smokers live.

Conclusions: An approach to tobacco control is advocated that combines changing smoking habits with reducing inequalities in the social trajectories in which they are embedded. Policies to level up opportunities and living standards across the lifecourse should be championed as part of an equity oriented approach to reducing the disease burden of cigarette smoking.

Keywords: women; smoking; disadvantage; social policies; social inequalities


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Greaves, L., Vallone, D., Velicer, W. (2006). Special effects: tobacco policies and low socioeconomic status girls and women. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: ii1-ii2 [Full Text]  
  • Greaves, L., Vallone, D., Allen, J. (2006). THE JECH GALLERY. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: ii33-ii33 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs