J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60(Supplement 2):ii57-ii65; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.045393
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greaves, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jategaonkar, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greaves, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jategaonkar, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Other Obstetrics and Gynecology

REVIEW

Tobacco policies and vulnerable girls and women: toward a framework for gender sensitive policy development

Lorraine Greaves, Natasha Jategaonkar

British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr L Greaves
British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada; lgreaves{at}cw.bc.ca

This article assesses the effects of comprehensive tobacco control policies on diverse subpopulations of girls and women who are at increased vulnerability to tobacco use because of disadvantage. The authors report on a recent assessment of experimental literature examining tobacco taxation; smoking location restrictions in public and private spaces; and sales restrictions. A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify relevant studies and evaluation reports. Gender based and diversity analyses were performed to identify pertinent sex differences and gender influences that would affect the application and impact of the policy. Finally, the results were contextualised within the wider literature on women’s tobacco use and women’s health. The authors consider not only the intended policy effects, but also explicitly examine the gendered and/or unintended consequences of these policies on other aspects of girls and women’s health and wellbeing. A framework for developing gender sensitive tobacco programmes and policies for low income girls and women is provided.


Abbreviations: SES, socioeconomic status; CTP, comprehensive tobacco policy; BP, best practice; GBA, gender based analysis

Keywords: gender; policy; smoking; tobacco; women




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Greaves, D. Vallone, and W. Velicer
Special effects: tobacco policies and low socioeconomic status girls and women
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii1 - ii2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Greaves, D. Vallone, and J. Allen
THE JECH GALLERY
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii33 - ii33.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.