J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60(Supplement 2):ii51-ii56; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.045591
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R. S
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R. S
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. E

RESEARCH REPORT

Tobacco free workplace policies and low socioeconomic status female bartenders in San Francisco

Roland S Moore, Juliet P Lee, Tamar M J Antin, Scott E Martin

Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R S Moore
Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 1995 University Avenue, Suite 450, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA; roland{at}prev.org

Study objective: Multiple studies have found that, compared with employees in other settings, workers in bars and restaurants have been exposed to high levels of secondhand smoke, putting them at increased risk for health complications. Among these bar employees are many women of low socioeconomic status (SES). Smoke free workplace ordinances have been extended to bars and restaurants in cities and states throughout the USA; some bars, however, continue to be out of compliance with these laws. The objective of this study is to assess the relation between bartender gender and smoke free workplace compliance in bars.

Design: This paper reports on analyses of observational data on compliance with smoke free workplace policy in 121 randomly selected bars together with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with bartenders and patrons in bars.

Setting: San Francisco County bars.

Main results: Findings from this research showed that smoke free policy non-compliance was associated with bars in which women were bartenders, increasing their tobacco exposure compared with male bartenders. In interviews, although some female bartenders expressed ambivalence toward the smoke free ordinance, many others described experiencing positive health and social consequences when the bars in which they worked could eliminate interior smoking.

Conclusions: The analyses presented here shed light on the benefits of improving the workplace environment for low SES female bartenders through the extension of strong smoke free workplace policies to all workplaces, including bars.


Abbreviations: SES, socioeconomic status; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; HLM, hierarchical linear modelling

Keywords: tobacco control policy; smoke free workplace policy; women; bartenders; social class




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Greaves, D. Vallone, and W. Velicer
Special effects: tobacco policies and low socioeconomic status girls and women
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii1 - ii2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Greaves, D. Vallone, and J. Allen
THE JECH GALLERY
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii33 - ii33.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.