J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60(Supplement 2):ii27-ii32; doi:10.1136/jech.2006.046276
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balbach, E. D
Right arrow Articles by Barbeau, E. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balbach, E. D
Right arrow Articles by Barbeau, E. M

RESEARCH REPORT

Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women

Edith D Balbach1, Abby Herzberg1, Elizabeth M Barbeau2

1 Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, USA
2 Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor E D Balbach
112 Packard Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA; edith.balbach{at}tufts.edu

Objectives: To assess how the tobacco industry established a political relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women (CLUW) and to learn from this example how tobacco control advocates can work more effectively with organisations with which working class women are affiliated.

Methods: The study reviewed tobacco industry documents to determine Tobacco Institute strategy, using the CLUW News and other published material to corroborate our findings.

Results: The Tobacco Institute was effective at framing excise tax and smokefree worksite issues in a way that facilitated CLUW’s support of industry positions on these issues. The Tobacco Institute was also willing to reciprocate by providing financial and other kinds of support to CLUW.

Conclusions: While tobacco control missed an opportunity to partner with CLUW on smokefree worksites and excise taxes in the 1980s and 1990s, tobacco control can also use issue framing and reciprocity to form coalitions with organisations representing the interests of working women.


Abbreviations: TI, Tobacco Institute; CLUW, Coalition of Labor Union Women; LMC, Labor Management Committee; TDO, Tobacco Documents Online; UCSF, University of California at San FRancisco

Keywords: tobacco; public health policy; coalitions; organised labour




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Greaves, D. Vallone, and W. Velicer
Special effects: tobacco policies and low socioeconomic status girls and women
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii1 - ii2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L. Greaves, D. Vallone, and J. Allen
THE JECH GALLERY
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii33 - ii33.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.