EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE
Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years later
1 South East London Strategic Health Authority and European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
2 South East London Strategic Health Authority, UK
3 Eastern Region Public Health Observatory, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Y Doyle
South East London Strategic Health Authority, 1 Lower Marsh, Waterloo, London SE1 7NT, UK; Yvonne.doyle{at}selondon.nhs.uk
Twenty years after Geoffrey Rose published his classic paper, the central messages remain highly relevant to modern public health policy and practice. The individual and population approaches are fundamentally different but both are needed. Recent examples of powerful population approaches prove Roses point that norms can change benefiting the most deprived. Individual approaches have also succeeded but their protection of the most deprived communities is limited. Consumerism in health and over-reliance on individual approaches risk widening health inequalities.
Keywords: incidence of disease; clinical epidemiology; preventative health care
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schmidt, H.
(2008). Bonuses as Incentives and Rewards for Health Responsibility: A Good Thing?. J Med Philos
33: 198-220
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
