Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60:213-217; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.040253
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

The polypill: at what price would it become cost effective?

Oscar H Franco1, Ewout W Steyerberg1, Chris de Laet2

1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Netherlands
2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam and Department of Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr O H Franco
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC. University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, office Ee 2006, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands; o.francoduran{at}erasmusmc.nl

Introduction: A promising concept in cardiovascular disease prevention (the polypill) was introduced in 2003. Although the polypill may seem as an effective intervention, data on its costs and cost effectiveness remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum price of the polypill for it to be a cost effective alternative in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Methods: Data on the hypothetical effects of the polypill were taken from the literature. Using data from the Framingham heart study and the Framingham offspring study, life tables were built to model the assumed benefits of the polypill. Using a third party payer perspective and a 10 years time horizon, the authors calculated what should be the maximum drug cost of the polypill for it to be cost effective (using a {euro}20 000/year of life saved threshold) in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among populations at different levels of absolute risk of coronary heart disease and age.

Results: To be cost effective among populations at levels of 10 year coronary heart disease risk over 20% (high risk), the annual cost of medication for the polypill therapy should be no more than {euro}302 or {euro}410 for men at age 50 and 60 years respectively. For cost effective prevention in populations at levels of coronary heart disease risk between 10% and 20% the costs should be two to three times lower.

Conclusion: Although the polypill could theoretically be a highly effective intervention, the costs of the medication could be its caveat for implementation in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: polypill; cost effectiveness; primary prevention; cardiovascular disease


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet, John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 60: 185. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs