RESEARCH REPORT

Bonding versus bridging social capital and their associations with self rated health: a multilevel analysis of 40 US communities

D Kim, S V Subramanian and I Kawachi

Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D Kim
Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02446, USA; dkim{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Study objective: Few studies have distinguished between the effects of different forms of social capital on health. This study distinguished between the health effects of summary measures tapping into the constructs of community bonding and community bridging social capital.

Design: A multilevel logistic regression analysis of community bonding and community bridging social capital in relation to individual self rated fair/poor health.

Setting: 40 US communities.

Participants: Within community samples of adults (n = 24 835), surveyed by telephone in 2000–2001.

Main results: Adjusting for community sociodemographic and socioeconomic composition and community level income and age, the odds ratio of reporting fair or poor health was lower for each 1-standard deviation (SD) higher community bonding social capital (OR = 0.86; 95% = 0.80 to 0.92) and each 1-SD higher community bridging social capital (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.02). The addition of indicators for individual level bonding and bridging social capital and social trust slightly attenuated the associations for community bonding social capital (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.97) and community bridging social capital (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.03). Individual level high formal bonding social capital, trust in members of one’s race/ethnicity, and generalised social trust were each significantly and inversely related to fair/poor health. Furthermore, significant cross level interactions of community social capital with individual race/ethnicity were seen, including weaker inverse associations between community bonding social capital and fair/poor health among black persons compared with white persons.

Conclusions: These results suggest modest protective effects of community bonding and community bridging social capital on health. Interventions and policies that leverage community bonding and bridging social capital might serve as means of population health improvement.

Keywords: social capital; bonding social capital; bridging social capital; self rated health; multilevel analysis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 60: 89. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Pitkin Derose, K., Varda, D. M. (2009). Social Capital and Health Care Access: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev 66: 272-306 [Abstract]  
• van Hooijdonk, C., Droomers, M., Deerenberg, I. M, Mackenbach, J. P, Kunst, A. E (2008). The diversity in associations between community social capital and health per health outcome, population group and location studied. Int J Epidemiol 37: 1384-1392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kim, D. (2008). Blues from the Neighborhood? Neighborhood Characteristics and Depression. Epidemiol Rev 30: 101-117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sapag, J C, Aracena, M, Villarroel, L, Poblete, F, Berrocal, C, Hoyos, R, Martinez, M, Kawachi, I (2008). Social capital and self-rated health in urban low income neighbourhoods in Chile. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 790-792 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Abel, T (2008). Cultural capital and social inequality in health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: e13-e13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ferlander, S. (2007). The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for Health. Acta Sociologica 50: 115-128 [Abstract]