Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60:858-864; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.044214
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

REVIEW

Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in parenting research: the issue of intention to treat

Karen Whittaker, Chris Sutton, Chris Burton

Department of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Karen Whittaker
Department of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK; kwhittaker1{at}uclan.ac.uk

Study objective: To evaluate trials of parenting programmes, regarding their use of intention to treat (ITT).

Design: Individual trials included in two relevant Cochrane systematic reviews were scrutinised by two independent reviewers. Data on country of origin, target audience, trial type, treatment violations, use of ITT, and the management of missing data were extracted.

Main results: Thirty trial reports were reviewed. Three reported the use of an ITT approach to data analysis. Nineteen reported losing subjects to follow up although the implications of this were rarely considered. Insufficient detail in reports meant it was difficult to identify study drop outs, the nature of treatment violations, and those failing to provide outcome assessments. In two trials, study drop outs were considered as additional control groups, violating the basic principle of ITT.

Conclusions: It is recommended that future trial reports adhere to CONSORT guidelines. In particular ITT should be used for the main analyses, with strategies for managing treatment violations and handling missing data being reported a priori. Those conducting trials need to acknowledge the social nature of these programmes can sometimes result in erratic parent attendance and participation, which would only increase the chances of missing data. The use of approaches that can limit the proportion of missing data is therefore recommended.

Keywords: CONSORT; intention to treat; parenting; randomised controlled trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet, John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 60: 825. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zwarenstein, M., Treweek, S., Gagnier, J. J, Altman, D. G, Tunis, S., Haynes, B., Oxman, A. D, Moher, D., for the CONSORT and Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare, (2008). Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 337: a2390-a2390 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs