RESEARCH REPORT

Framing pub smoking bans: an analysis of Australian print news media coverage, March 1996–March 2003

David Champion, Simon Chapman

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor S Chapman
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia; simonchapman{at}health.usyd.edu.au

Objective: To investigate framing strategies used by the Australian Hotels Association (AHA) and tobacco control groups to (respectively) resist or advocate laws providing smoke free bars.

Methods: Online archives of Australian print media were searched 1996 to 2003. A thematic analysis of all statements made by AHA spokespeople and tobacco control advocates was conducted. Direct quotes or journalistic summaries of statements attributed to named people were coded into four broad themes and the slant of articles coded.

Results: More than three times as many articles reported issues that were positive (n = 171) than negative (n = 48) for tobacco control objectives. The AHA emphasised negative economic issues and cultural/ideological frames about cultural identity, while tobacco control interests emphasised health concerns as well as cultural/ideological frames about threats to inequitable workplace policies.

Conclusions: Smoke free bars have now been secured, suggesting that health advocates’ position prevailed. The inability of the AHA to avoid the core health arguments, its wildly exaggerated economic predictions, and its frequent recourse to claiming smoke bans threatened nostalgic but outmoded vistas of Australian day to day life were decidedly backward looking and comparatively easily dismissed as being out of touch with views held by many in contemporary Australia. Health groups’ emphasis on the unfairness in denying the most occupationally exposed group the same protection that all other workers enjoyed under law was powerfully and consistently argued. Australia’s recent success in securing dates for the implementation of smoke free pubs is likely to have owed much to the enduring media advocacy by health groups.

Abbreviations: AHA, Australian Hotels Association; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke

Keywords: environmental tobacco smoke; news media; politics; smoking

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Happiness, inequalities, and health

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet, John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 59: 613. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• McLeod, K, Wakefield, M, Chapman, S, Smith, K C., Durkin, S (2009). Changes in the news representation of smokers and tobacco-related media advocacy from 1995 to 2005 in Australia. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 215-220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Goh, D. (2008). It's the Gays' Fault: News and HIV as Weapons Against Homosexuality in Singapore. Journal of Communication Inquiry 32: 383-399 [Abstract]  
• Chapman, S. (2007). The future of smoke-free legislation. BMJ 335: 521-522 [Full Text]  
• HANSEN, A., GUNTER, B. (2007). CONSTRUCTING PUBLIC AND POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON ALCOHOL ISSUES: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS. Alcohol Alcohol 42: 150-157 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carter, S. M, Chapman, S. (2006). Smokers and non-smokers talk about regulatory options in tobacco control.. Tobacco Control 15: 398-404 [Abstract] [Full Text]