Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005;59:420-426; doi:10.1136/jech.2003.019109
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005;59:420-426
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

THEORY AND METHODS

Performance profile of an outcome measure: morbidity assessment index for newborns

Anila Verma1, Angela Weir2, Jane Drummond2 and Bryan F Mitchell1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2 Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Verma
Clinical Safety and Epidemiology, Bldg 419/1150, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, New Jersey, USA 07936; anila.verma{at}pharma.novartis.com

Objective: Few tools have been optimised for use over the entire spectrum of neonatal morbidity and standardised for use in perinatal population and community health studies. The objective of this study was to determine the performance profile of the recently developed morbidity assessment index for newborns (MAIN score). This score was designed as a discriminative index of morbidity for the entire population of babies delivered >28 weeks gestation without a major congenital anomaly.

Design and setting: MAIN score items were extracted retrospectively from the health records of 2892 consecutively born babies delivered beyond 28 weeks gestation in Edmonton area hospitals between June and December of 1999.

Main results: The mean MAIN score in the general newborn population was 70.3 (95% confidence intervals 64.2 to 76.4). With the MAIN score tool, 84.6% of newborns scored from 0 to 150 (no/minimal morbidity), 11.3% from 151 to 500 (mild), 3.1% from 501 to 800 (moderate), and 1% had >800 (severe) score. The MAIN score tool was sufficiently sensitive to detect significant effects of low gestational age, low birth weight, male sex, caesarean delivery, tertiary hospital delivery, twins/triplets, non-vertex presentation, prenatal illicit drug use, and medical complications of pregnancy.

Conclusion: The MAIN score fulfills the need for a simple, universal, yet sensitive and robust tool to provide a numerical index of early neonatal outcomes of prenatal care and adverse prenatal exposures in babies delivered beyond 28 weeks gestation. The performance of the MAIN score agrees well with the current medical awareness regarding the impact of adverse prenatal exposures on newborn morbidity.

Abbreviations: BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; MAIN, morbidity assessment index for newborns

Keywords: newborn morbidity; high risk pregnancy; perinatal epidemiology; maternal child health; outcome measurement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Common sense, the least common sense?
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 59: 341. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs