RESEARCH REPORT

Who you live with and where you live: setting the context for health using multiple membership multilevel models

Tarani Chandola¹, Paul Clarke¹, Richard D Wiggins² and Mel Bartley¹

¹ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
² Department of Sociology, City University, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Chandola
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK; tarani{at}public-health.ucl.ac.uk

Study objective: Previous studies into the effect of area of residence on individuals’ health have not accounted for changing residency over time, although few people remain resident in the same area throughout their life. Furthermore, few studies of area effects on health have accounted for the clustering of health at the household level. These methodological problems may have led previous studies to under estimate or over estimate the size of area level effects. This study uses multiple membership multilevel models to investigate whether longitudinal analyses of area effects on health need to take account of clustering at the household level.

Setting and participants: A longitudinal survey (1991–1999) of a nationally representative sample of British households (5511 households with 10 264 adult members).

Design: Two level (individuals within households or areas) and three level (individuals within households within areas) multiple membership models of SF-36 physical and mental health functioning scores at wave nine were analysed adjusting for age, gender, education, marital, employment, and smoking status from previous waves.

Results: Physical and mental health functioning seem to cluster within households. Accounting for changes in household membership over time increases estimates of the clustering in functioning at the household level. The clustering of functioning within area wards is reduced when the clustering within households and risk factors for functioning are taken into account.

Conclusions: Clustered sampling units within study designs should be taken account of in individual level analyses. Changes in these units over time should be accounted for in longitudinal analysis.

Abbreviations: BHPS, British household panel survey; PCS, physical health component score; MCS, mental health component score; DIC, deviance information criterion; ICC, intraclass correlation

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

News scoop—hold the front page: "poverty damages health"

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 59: 89. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Callens, M., Croux, C. (2009). Poverty Dynamics in Europe: A Multilevel Recurrent Discrete-Time Hazard Analysis. International Sociology 24: 368-396 [Abstract]  
• Urquia, M. L., Frank, J. W., Glazier, R. H., Moineddin, R., Matheson, F. I., Gagnon, A. J. (2009). Neighborhood Context and Infant Birthweight Among Recent Immigrant Mothers: A Multilevel Analysis. Am. J. Public Health 99: 285-293 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Giatti, L, Barreto, S M, Cesar, C C. (2008). Household context and self-rated health: the effect of unemployment and informal work. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 1079-1085 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Naess, O, Claussen, B, Davey Smith, G, Leyland, A H (2008). Life course influence of residential area on cause-specific mortality. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 29-34 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Leyland, A. H (2005). Assessing the impact of mobility on health: implications for life course epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 90-91 [Full Text]