Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005;59:934-940; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.035931
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH REPORT

Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia

Anne M Kavanagh1,2, Jane L Goller1,3, Tania King1,2, Damien Jolley4, David Crawford5 and Gavin Turrell6

1 Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
2 Key Centre for Women’s Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
3 Department of Human Services, Victoria, Australia
4 Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
5 Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research School Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
6 School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A M Kavanagh
Key Centre for Women’s Health in Society, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia; a.kavanagh{at}unimelb.edu.au

Objective: To estimate variation between small areas in the levels of walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and overall physical activity and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation.

Methods: All census collector districts (CCDs) in the 20 innermost local government areas in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, were identified and ranked by the percentage of low income households (<$400/week) living in the CCD. Fifty CCDs were randomly selected from the least, middle, and most disadvantaged septiles of the ranked CCDs and 2349 residents (58.7% participation rate) participated in a cross sectional postal survey about physical activity. Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for extrabinomial variation) was used to estimate area level variation in walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and in overall physical activity participation, and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation.

Results: There were significant variations between CCDs in all activities and in overall physical participation in age and sex adjusted models; however, after adjustment for individual SES (income, occupation, education) and area level socioeconomic disadvantage, significant differences remained only for walking (p = 0.004), cycling (p = 0.003), and swimming (p = 0.024). Living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of jogging and of having overall physical activity levels that were sufficiently active for health; these effects remained after adjustment for individual socioeconomic status (sufficiently active: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90 and jogging: OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94).

Conclusion: These research findings support the need to focus on improving local environments to increase physical activity participation.

Abbreviations: SES, socioeconomic status; CCD, census collector district

Keywords: physical activity; socioeconomic status; multilevel analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Coherence, Location, and Public Health
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 59: 913. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kamphuis, C B M, Giskes, K, Kavanagh, A M, Thornton, L E, Thomas, L R, van Lenthe, F J, Mackenbach, J P, Turrell, G (2008). Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne: a compositional or contextual effect?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 890-898 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gauvin, L., Riva, M., Barnett, T., Richard, L., Craig, C. L., Spivock, M., Laforest, S., Laberge, S., Fournel, M.-C., Gagnon, H., Gagne, S. (2008). Association between Neighborhood Active Living Potential and Walking. Am J Epidemiol 167: 944-953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Riva, M., Gauvin, L., Barnett, T. A (2007). Toward the next generation of research into small area effects on health: a synthesis of multilevel investigations published since July 1998. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61: 853-861 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kavanagh, A. M, Bentley, R., Turrell, G., Broom, D. H, Subramanian, S V (2006). Does gender modify associations between self rated health and the social and economic characteristics of local environments?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 490-495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Popham, F., Mitchell, R. (2006). Leisure time exercise and personal circumstances in the working age population: longitudinal analysis of the British household panel survey.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 270-274 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Re: Urban area disadvantage and physical activity
Wenbin Liang
J Epidemiol Community Health Online, 22 Nov 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs