EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing

H Roberts¹, K Curtis¹, K Liabo¹, D Rowland², C DiGuiseppi³ and I Roberts²

¹ Child Health Research and Policy Unit, City University, London, UK
² Public Health Intervention Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
³ Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Ms K Curtis
Child Health Research and Policy Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, City University, 20 Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7QN, UK; k.curtis{at}city.ac.uk

Study objectives: The UK government recommends that local authorities install battery operated smoke alarms to prevent fire related injury. However, a randomised controlled trial of smoke alarm installation in local authority housing found a low level of working alarms at follow up. Qualitative work, which accompanied the trial explored barriers and levers to the use of this public health intervention.

Design: Semi-structured group and individual interviews were conducted with a sample of the adult participants in a randomised controlled trial of free smoke alarm installation. Group interviews and "draw and write" exercises were conducted with children at a local primary school.

Participants: A sample of trial participants and primary school children in the trial neighbourhood.

Setting: An inner city housing estate in central London.

Main results: The main barrier to smoke alarm use was the distress caused by false alarms. Although trial participants considered themselves to be at high risk for fires and would recommend smoke alarms to others, respondents’ reports on the distress caused by false alarms suggest that people balance immediate and longer term risks to their health and wellbeing when they disable alarms.

Conclusions: This study identified some of the reasons for the low level of functioning smoke alarms, and problems experienced with alarms. The results have implications for the implementation of this public health intervention. The effectiveness of smoke alarm installation could be improved if alarm manufacturers and those responsible for implementation programmes considered ways of tackling the issues raised in this study.

Keywords: public health implementation; smoke alarms

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Inequalities goes global

C Alvarez-Dardet and J R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004 58: 261. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kendrick, D., Mulvaney, C., Watson, M. (2009). Does targeting injury prevention towards families in disadvantaged areas reduce inequalities in safety practices?. Health Educ Res 24: 32-41 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blair, M. (2007). How has research in the past 5 years changed my practice?. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 246-250 [Full Text]  
• Brussoni, M, Towner, E, Hayes, M (2006). Evidence into practice: combining the art and science of injury prevention. Inj. Prev. 12: 373-377 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Arai, L, Roen, K, Roberts, H, Popay, J (2005). It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors. Inj. Prev. 11: 148-151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hawe, P., Shiell, A., Riley, T., Gold, L. (2004). Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 788-793 [Abstract] [Full Text]