Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004;58:243-249; doi:10.1136/jech.2003.009654
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004;58:243-249
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

THEORY AND METHODS

Evaluation of methodologies for small area life expectancy estimation

D Eayres1 and E S Williams2

1 National Centre for Health Outcome Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2 Adur, Arun and Worthing Primary Care Trust, Goring by Sea, Worthing, West Sussex, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr D P Eayres
National Centre for Health Outcome Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 99 Gower Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK: daniel.eayres{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Study objective: To evaluate methods for calculating life expectancy in small areas, for example, English electoral wards.

Design: The Monte Carlo method was used to simulate the distribution of life expectancy (and its standard error) estimates for 10 alternative life table models. The models were combinations of Chiang or Silcocks methodology, 5 or 10 year age intervals, and a final age interval of 85+, 90+, or 95+.

Setting: A hypothetical small area experiencing the population age structure and age specific mortality rates of English men 1998–2000.

Participants: Routine mortality and population statistics for England.

Main results: Silcocks and Chiang based models gave similar estimates of life expectancy and its standard error. For all models, life expectancy was increasingly overestimated as the simulated population size decreased. The degree of overestimation depended largely on the final age interval chosen. Life expectancy estimates of small populations are normally distributed. The standard error estimates are normally distributed for large populations but become increasingly skewed as the population size decreases. Substitution methods to compensate for the effect of zero death counts on the standard error estimate did not improve the estimate.

Conclusions: It is recommended that a population years at risk of 5000 is a reasonable point above which life expectancy calculations can be performed with reasonable confidence. Implications are discussed. Within the UK, the Chiang methodology and a five year life table to 85+ is recommended, with no adjustments to age specific death counts of zero.

Keywords: life expectancy; small areas; Monte Carlo method


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

On neighbourhoods, communities and inequalities, and something on sexually transmitted infections
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004 58: 161. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Williams, E. S, Dinsdale, H., Eayres, D., Tahzib, F. (2004). Impact of nursing home deaths on life expectancy calculations in small areas. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 958-962 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs