Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004;58:180-185; doi:10.1136/jech.2003.015594
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004;58:180-185
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

How did general practitioners protect themselves, their family, and staff during the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong?

W C W Wong1, A Lee2, K K Tsang2 and S Y S Wong1

1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
2 Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr W C W Wong
Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong; cwwong{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Context: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a newly emerging infectious disease and how the frontline community doctors respond to it is not known.

Objectives: To explore the impact of SARS on general practitioners (GPs) in Hong Kong.

Design: A cross sectional survey.

Setting: Community based primary care clinics.

Participants: 183 family medicine tutors affiliated with a local university. Postal survey sent to all tutors with a 74.8% response rate.

Main outcome measures: Change of clinical behaviour and practices during the epidemic; anxiety level of primary care doctors.

Results: All agreed SARS had changed their clinical practices. Significant anxiety was found in family doctors. Three quarters of respondents recalled requesting more investigations while a quarter believed they had over-prescribed antibiotics. GPs who were exposed to SARS or who had worked in high infection districts were less likely to quarantine themselves (10.8% versus 33.3%; p<0.01; 6.5% versus 27.5%; p<0.01 respectively). Exposure to SARS, the infection rates in their working district, and anxiety levels had significant impact on the level of protection or prescribing behaviour.

Conclusion: The clinical practice of GPs changed significantly as a result of SARS. Yet, those did not quarantine themselves suggesting other factors may have some part to play. As failure to apply isolation precautions to suspected cases of SARS was one major reason for its spread, a contingency plan from the government to support family doctors is of utmost importance. Interface between private and public sectors are needed in Hong Kong to prepare for any future epidemics.

Keywords: general practitioners; SARS; severe acute respiratory syndrome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

On neighbourhoods, communities and inequalities, and something on sexually transmitted infections
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004 58: 161. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Jones, S. C., Iverson, D. (2008). What Australians Know and Believe About Bird Flu: Results of a Population Telephone Survey. Health Promot Pract 9: 73S-82S [Abstract]  
  • Wong, S. Y. S., Wong, W., Jaakkimainen, L., Bondy, S., Tsang, K. K., Lee, A. (2005). Primary care physicians in Hong Kong and Canada--how did their practices differ during the SARS epidemic?. Fam Pract 22: 361-366 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, A., Wong, W., Wong, S. Y. S., Tsang, K. K. (2004). Interfacing between primary and secondary care is needed. BMJ 329: 403-403 [Full Text]  
  • (2004). Minerva. BMJ 328: 532-532 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs

Infectious diseases and epidemilogy jobs