RESEARCH REPORT

Poorer self assessed health in a prospective study of men with screen detected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a predictor or a consequence of screening outcome?

Theresa M Marteau¹, Lois G Kim², Jane Upton³, Simon G Thompson² and Alan P Scott^4,*

¹ Health Psychology Section (Guy’s), Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, King’s College London, UK
² MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK
³ Research Centre for Health Studies, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, UK
⁴ St Richards Hospital, Chichester, West Sussex, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor T M Marteau
Health Psychology Section (Guy’s), 5th Floor Thomas Guy House, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, UK; theresa.marteau{at}kcl.ac.uk

Study objectives: To assess the extent to which poorer self assessed health in men in whom an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is detected at screening is a consequence or a predictor of screening outcome.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Community based screening.

Participants: 23 654 men who attended for AAA screening as part of the UK multicentre aneurysm screening study completed a measure of self assessed health before screening. A total of 1156 had an aneurysm detected. A sub-sample of screened men (571 with an aneurysm and 609 with a normal aorta) also completed the measure of self assessed health six weeks after screening.

Main results: Men in whom an aneurysm was detected at screening perceived their health to be poorer before screening than those with a normal aorta. Adjusting for risk factors for AAA made no difference to this result: self assessed health remained a strong predictor of having an aneurysm (odds ratio 1.7 comparing the extreme quartiles of self assessed health, 95% confidence intervals: 1.4 to 2.0). Men with an aneurysm also perceived their health to be poorer after screening had detected their aneurysms, but only to an extent in line with their pre-screening perceptions.

Conclusions: Self assessed health seems to predict having an aortic aneurysm, independently of known risk factors. This emphasises the importance of assessing baseline perceptions of health to prevent erroneously inferring that poorer self assessed health in those who screen positive is a consequence as compared with a predictor of screening outcome.

Abbreviations: MASS, multicentre aneurysm screening study; AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; BP, blood pressure

Keywords: self assessed health; screening; abdominal aortic aneurysm

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The journal of the increasingly relevant

Carlos Álvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004 58: 965. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Thompson, S G, Ashton, H A, Gao, L, Scott, R A P, on behalf of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening St, (2009). Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. BMJ 338: b2307-b2307 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dankner, R., Geulayov, G., Olmer, L., Kaplan, G. (2009). Undetected type 2 diabetes in older adults. Age Ageing 38: 56-62 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marteau, T. M (2008). Detection is not as harmful as it might seem. BMJ 336: 973-974 [Full Text]  
• Greenhalgh, R., Powell, J. (2007). Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ 335: 732-733 [Full Text]  
• Kim, L. G., P. Scott, R. A., Ashton, H. A., Thompson, S. G., for the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group, (2007). A Sustained Mortality Benefit from Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. ANN INTERN MED 146: 699-706 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brodersen, J., Thorsen, H., McKenna, S., Doward, L., Marteau, T. M, Kim, L. G, Thompson, S. G, Upton, J., Scott, A. P (2005). Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 609-609 [Full Text]  
• McCaffery, K. J, Barratt, A. L (2004). Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 968-970 [Full Text]