EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

¹ Environmental Health Unit, National Institute of Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice, France
² Public Health Agency, Barcelona, Spain
³ Valencian School of Studies for Health, Valencia, Spain
⁴ Federal Environmental Agency, WHO Collaborating Centre, Berlin, Germany
⁵ Environmental Epidemiology Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Medina
DSE, InVS, 12 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint Maurice cedex, France; s.medina{at}invs.sante.fr

Study objective: Apheis is a public health surveillance system that aims to provide European, national, regional, and local decision makers, environmental health professionals, and the general public with up to date and easy to use information on air pollution and public health. This study presents the health impact assessment done in 19 cities of Western and Eastern European countries.

Design: Apheis developed guidelines for gathering and analysing data on air pollution and the impact on public health. Apheis has analysed the acute and chronic effects of fine particles on premature mortality using the estimates developed by Aphea2 study and two American cohort studies. This health impact assessment was performed for different scenarios on the health benefits of reducing levels of particles less than 10 µm in size (PM₁₀).

Main results: PM₁₀ concentrations were measured in 19 cities (range: 14–73 µg/m³). The population covered in this health impact assessment includes nearly 32 million inhabitants. The age standardised mortality rates (per 100 000 people) range from 456 in Toulouse to 1127 in Bucharest. Reducing long term exposure to PM₁₀ concentrations by 5 µg/m³ would have "prevented" between 3300 and 7700 early deaths annually, 500 to 1000 of which are associated with short term exposure.

Conclusions: Apheis shows that current levels of air pollution in urban Europe have a non-negligible impact on public health, and that preventive measures could reduce this impact, even in cities with low levels of air pollution.

Keywords: health impact assessment; outdoor air pollution; Apheis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Time for poetry

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet, John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2004 58: 805. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ballester, F., Medina, S., Boldo, E., Goodman, P., Neuberger, M., Iniguez, C., Kunzli, N., on behalf of the Apheis network, (2008). Reducing ambient levels of fine particulates could substantially improve health: a mortality impact assessment for 26 European cities. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 98-105 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Henrotin, J B, Besancenot, J P, Bejot, Y, Giroud, M (2007). Short-term effects of ozone air pollution on ischaemic stroke occurrence: a case-crossover analysis from a 10-year population-based study in Dijon, France. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 439-445 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nawrot, T S, Torfs, R, Fierens, F, De Henauw, S, Hoet, P H, Van Kersschaever, G, De Backer, G, Nemery, B (2007). Stronger associations between daily mortality and fine particulate air pollution in summer than in winter: evidence from a heavily polluted region in western Europe. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61: 146-149 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Garcia, A. M, Alvarez-Dardet, C. (2005). A journal for evidence based policies. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 716-717 [Full Text]